From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC94E1381F3 for ; Sat, 6 Apr 2013 22:36:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 26C63E0874; Sat, 6 Apr 2013 22:36:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo-p05-ob.rzone.de (mo-p05-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.180]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B58AE0872 for ; Sat, 6 Apr 2013 22:36:38 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-AUTH: :IW0NeWCpcPchHrcnS4ebzBgQnKHTmUiSF2JlOcyz+57jTVMtVX7771jWiJc= X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 Received: from pinacolada.localnet (95-130-165-192.hsi.glasfaser-ostbayern.de [95.130.165.192]) by smtp.strato.de (josoe mo42) (RZmta 31.24 AUTH) with ESMTPA id J061d5p36LTJi2 for ; Sun, 7 Apr 2013 00:36:32 +0200 (CEST) From: "Andreas K. Huettel" To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2013-04-09 Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2013 00:37:22 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.6.11-gentoo; KDE/4.10.2; x86_64; ; ) References: <20817.55135.354752.397336@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20831.474.441795.677277@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20130406154314.0d7dc7ef@caribou.gateway.2wire.net> In-Reply-To: <20130406154314.0d7dc7ef@caribou.gateway.2wire.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart42680045.f9ozN9eFQf"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201304070037.28554.dilfridge@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 311df499-baeb-4a14-bc3e-54452d0eb50c X-Archives-Hash: 5dba8cbde0c2447f0d4ca600b4ed4b3f --nextPart42680045.f9ozN9eFQf Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Samstag, 6. April 2013, 23:43:14 schrieb Ryan Hill: > On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 18:54:50 +0200 >=20 > Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > I'd be a little more proactive and deprecate EAPIs 0 and 1 immediately > > (which would correspond to the 4 years mentioned above). When doing a > > version or revision bump, the ebuild should be updated to use a newer > > EAPI. There can be exceptions, e.g. for security bumps. >=20 > Toolchain packages are EAPI 0 and we aren't changing. That sounds a bit like "over my ..." Care to elaborate why? =2D-=20 Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer=20 dilfridge@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/ --nextPart42680045.f9ozN9eFQf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQJ8BAABCgBmBQJRYKOoXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQwNzlCRDk4QzA4RENBRkYzQUEwRjQzMDlF QkU2QTMzNkJFMTkwMzlDAAoJEOvmoza+GQOc+gUP/0xHlIRtP2855qM6TiswZ/1e 1/W67GMGzevrxXJKJDeDPScIeJSUXiWfNGiXkpfMLVxLKN1452g13dOwTu9wbfgA XQ2u3BwfJJRUC5klT2AZGfSCgyXgaA4QL7bAtC0vfucoL49L3f11lag1dJ9aTzQn xLeGFcRNT/XcQGQn++RCFTCklmhYHe0SIwjjgkaC6gJ63WUapxBGGEMJOagrjI3d HnE+ardm4cb+6G2LkkkCn5/2NjYjhsyCO+78eKJga2apKDtLmuamCI9SpVHiM69t /Q4gAY6WJgzq1mu3LoFM6ehErPzumR2xDrklBGizpnkDUM0aYuUGYwm0SpZJS2Ld MQNymoCkDtViKFIt0bx12geFTrCGFjac8Fbtf/qsZK6uQmuNSM9lmBVZ6RlWwWgp FD3rAgwe7oubMoA2QScF5iKw9w9uQ5JO0NxF+RNANFTcGKcLH+iOnrLjB+ylQHzC 14h/RKIWNetYEqhBhFWC++E21h+uz5vxtbOtB3uYmzV4dNfGxFL3yhhgf3fjnMqp KgKO9YcV8fPyMAZ7XflFO6eLgmYab5qbYbWv4BMpncSvYX0yplZPqy0cBFOldSxt QNYbte/2fundZIA3yW8/PjzAn7Ci5Tb9ZfFvj64zyXnI2XCSNzgSwaSk5NaJmK/C N24nWjR2510l2mJPz+Oq =vXry -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart42680045.f9ozN9eFQf--