From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E084F138010 for ; Sat, 30 Mar 2013 10:22:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 06FA2E086E; Sat, 30 Mar 2013 10:22:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 360BEE0808 for ; Sat, 30 Mar 2013 10:22:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (77-255-217-157.adsl.inetia.pl [77.255.217.157]) (using SSLv3 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 98E7133DC05; Sat, 30 Mar 2013 10:22:08 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 11:22:54 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2013-04-09 Message-ID: <20130330112254.6e3e1d3a@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <20817.55135.354752.397336@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> References: <20817.55135.354752.397336@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.17; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA512; boundary="Sig_/c_DXmYFqaPnJzrlcY7mOWYf"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: d0cc24b4-ee0c-4dbd-a3fa-6844f3e98bd9 X-Archives-Hash: 03abd30d8945aa816e39b48fab8a9a62 --Sig_/c_DXmYFqaPnJzrlcY7mOWYf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 18:14:07 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > Please respond to this email with agenda items. Please do not hesitate > to repeat your agenda item here with a pointer if you previously > suggested one (since the last meeting). I would like the Council to take an initial look, and possible vote on switching to a newer bash version (preferably bash-4.2, stable Sep 2012) in the next EAPI (bug #431340 [1]). This would need some kind of schedule since it depends on EAPI parsing which went stable in Jul 2012). If the transition period needs to be extended, I'd prefer having it in EAPI 6 anyway but adding a policy like 'do not use it in global scope until ...', so that pre-EAPI-6 package manager compatibility would be retained. [1]:https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D431340 --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/c_DXmYFqaPnJzrlcY7mOWYf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJRVr0DXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ1RUJGMjBGOTk2RkIzQzIyQ0M2RkNBNDBC QUJGMUQ1RkY4QzgxMTBBAAoJELq/HV/4yBEKWNcP/3uxReu97rkx2yeZajHeyv1D dcyZADDdmGeFl1wP9i50pa+PCrxy67Vr5DiyeA+Ag3NB7ANwFtuHnHZJ8IsOfK6l rehlI5b32esXqD0DUCyPUjp1Tt2r0Aro6xdK1QLQv8+fyPxHSW0sTS+LjNBJlM10 LcezcCT9Q53twJasdMOgFnx/k73me1bJDzKdlocKvNUnxi+f/9QGcRmw0dd6xS6j cBnZ9WHj77xl3RLbhdx9pxY/5w/LfmPp7Fo6dj20oHfXjhWsb7MTkuvZQ8xMNBxJ pWW/uy74ZLzvzCxtawktraPolMwJPrDwlcg4wXZcqRlfEXE8Sc5nQiSOQc7/aP5I 1TgnKmnv/VEByBDRlBq9Fe0vMeP16WzVXyGKF4M3cR3a8KmmC+4oorNFiVjKEerV 4JTIwG3r0YxEGWyCQ7cdJK31wATQeY7B89MHHijpKJdPFLCRMIYUQ9xu2YFft608 8e3IQxUE8fQHxbnitCfzJ6Piv7iAcTlVmMcu/2ZTZYF7k6D4IA8jbrn/jM1cWAu6 KYaUMNBHpA2YMDscvSypjcZ1owxr9CJS2q91hLx+WJEC1l04T344rfva//KPd5pF 0W5vmaJhyTaLhOigv0ICRpRsYUSpfB/eBFd18FQCZQBpmTdMJGkYp4UHvMVQ89Cv fYOw8y6aM0xPxfVeddOw =0Yv0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/c_DXmYFqaPnJzrlcY7mOWYf--