Re: [gentoo-project] With regard to udev stabilization

[Alexis Ballier <aballier@gentoo.org>]

On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:44:15 +0100
Fabian Groffen <grobian@gentoo.org> wrote:

> On 13-11-2012 09:06:19 -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:55 AM, Fabian Groffen
> > <grobian@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > > On 12-11-2012 21:40:53 -0500, Richard Yao wrote:
> > >> I understand that the council is scheduled to vote on a topic
> > >> related to udev stabilization. Would it be possible to delay the
> > >> vote for another month so that we have time to get organized?
> > >
> > > The Council has no votes scheduled for today's meeting.
> > >
> > 
> > Huh?
> 
> Do you see the word "vote" in there?  (It isn't in there on purpose.)
> 

what's the difference between 'approve/disapprove' and 'vote' ? the
difference is not clear to me.

> 
> > 2. Handling separate /usr support[1] (15 minutes)
> >    - approve/disapprove plan (forcing everyone to take action, and
> >      implement one of the two "supported" solutions)
> >    - approve/disapprove removal of gen_usr_ldscript
> >    - define timeframe
> >      * 30 days
> >      * 6 months
> >      * 1 year
> > 
> > 3. Policy on "<" versioned dependencies[2] (5 minutes)
> >    - state whether said policy exists (homework for the council
> > members)
>