public inbox for gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Council meeting: Tuesday 11 November 2012, 19:00 UTC
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 12:25:27 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121108182527.GA3931@linux1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGfcS_=5_Yzp2gt8D3y1LGkAQ=AnudAZZNO+SbubAjYZk-iUDw@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2021 bytes --]

On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 12:46:20PM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Alexis Ballier <aballier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 22:28:16 +0100
> > Fabian Groffen <grobian@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >>    - approve/disapprove removal of gen_usr_ldscript
> >
> > I'm not sure what you meant here, but if that meant 'make it a no-op on
> > systems where it makes sense', then fine by me. Otherwise, please keep
> > in mind that removing it will also affect g/fbsd where this is still
> > needed in order to have a sane / and /usr separation.
> 
> I haven't really seen any discussion of this so I'll chime in.
> 
> Up until now most of the discussion has been about ALLOWING
> maintainers to stick boot-required files in /usr at some point in the
> future.  Changing things like gen_usr_ldscript would actually
> represent an active push towards moving these files into /usr.  I
> think that is a big distinction, and it would cause our Linux vs BSD
> approaches to diverge unless we forced BSD to follow along.
 
 There's no reason to make *bsd do anything. gen_usr_ldscript is already
 smart enough to not do anything in some environments; I'm just
 proposing adding linux to that list.

> I think there is a difference between allowing a few Linux-only
> packages to move to /usr to follow upstream and moving towards a full
> scale /usr migration on Linux for all packages, even if their
> upstreams don't use /usr.
 
 I'm not talking about migrating *anything* at this point, just how to
 implement separate /usr support on linux, without affecting what the
 alternate platforms are doing.

> I think the more conservative approach is to take things one step at a
> time - after some period of time allow things to move to /usr, but
> leave it up to maintainer discretion, since they're the ones getting
> bugs from linux, BSD, etc.

Please let's keep this thread on topic. Migrating packages is another
separate discussion.

Thanks,

William


[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-08 21:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-06 21:28 [gentoo-project] Council meeting: Tuesday 11 November 2012, 19:00 UTC Fabian Groffen
2012-11-08 16:30 ` [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] " Alexis Ballier
2012-11-08 17:46   ` Rich Freeman
2012-11-08 18:25     ` William Hubbs [this message]
2012-11-08 17:45 ` [gentoo-project] " William Hubbs
2012-11-08 18:15   ` Fabian Groffen
2012-11-08 18:53     ` William Hubbs
2012-11-08 21:16       ` Rich Freeman
2012-11-08 22:09         ` William Hubbs
2012-11-08 22:28           ` Rich Freeman
2012-11-08 23:46       ` Alexis Ballier
2012-11-09  5:13         ` William Hubbs
2012-11-09 11:19           ` Rich Freeman
2012-11-09 11:33           ` Alexis Ballier
2012-11-09 15:32             ` William Hubbs
2012-11-09 16:03               ` Rich Freeman
2012-11-09 17:01                 ` William Hubbs
2012-11-09 18:21               ` Fabian Groffen
2012-11-10  1:42                 ` William Hubbs
2012-11-10  9:00                   ` Fabian Groffen
2012-11-10 19:37                     ` William Hubbs
2012-11-10 19:39                       ` Ian Stakenvicius
2012-11-10 21:10                         ` [gentoo-project] Council meeting: Tuesday 13 " Petteri Räty
2012-11-11  8:51                       ` Fabian Groffen
2012-11-11 18:43                         ` William Hubbs
2012-11-09 18:21               ` [gentoo-project] Council meeting: Tuesday 11 " Alexis Ballier
2012-11-09  8:26         ` Fabian Groffen
2012-11-11  8:53 ` [gentoo-project] [corrected date] Council meeting: Tuesday 13 " Fabian Groffen
2012-11-11 10:57 ` [gentoo-project] Council meeting: Tuesday 11 " Ulrich Mueller
2012-11-17 19:02 ` [gentoo-project] Summary Council meeting Tuesday 13 November 2012 Fabian Groffen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121108182527.GA3931@linux1 \
    --to=williamh@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox