From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-project+bounces-2214-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7B741381F3
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 18:02:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6989221C050
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 18:02:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ob0-f181.google.com (mail-ob0-f181.google.com [209.85.214.181])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22F0C21C00A
for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 17:38:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ob0-f181.google.com with SMTP id ta14so591196obb.40
for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 08 Nov 2012 09:38:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to
:user-agent;
bh=Cxn+tG+jcijR3WoUsTz1ldc4u75qFF4tlzJ3iwWjUI0=;
b=i+WRAeJqyI0qdendE32WYjgrc9tPpNkZpasO8mHZO3G/93YiRhZXfSu2luTq6FKR/H
up84w5NL+uSxFSeg6Ja6kc1h9i9d36Z8nylcsTYF2zcZjfXB22lH4zMt4S4qjljnSbvk
WxJH4FrKAMzD3d2YSALl4WtXPi5Oqfxl53kQqomfz8QJeeQ+B2KpRorWoneYRqDZ/Xqe
qbLdZAQwkQCd/eIOBE3fQxtM8khmmAiqs97Kq9BYkWu/dE5VBwGzAhVdbfvzs8+TyUZr
b1MTJ25pnCvVFnEH+gGDdGScmxV1J4emr30Qg2A6vptGl2qcoIz6scqAWxcnPNSA1/9e
fcXA==
Received: by 10.60.9.42 with SMTP id w10mr5726147oea.78.1352396308216;
Thu, 08 Nov 2012 09:38:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-187-95-60.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.95.60])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z1sm5846974oeh.7.2012.11.08.09.38.23
(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Thu, 08 Nov 2012 09:38:25 -0800 (PST)
Sender: William Hubbs <w.d.hubbs@gmail.com>
Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 08 Nov 2012 11:38:22 -0600
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 11:38:22 -0600
From: William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting
13-11-2012
Message-ID: <20121108173822.GA3842@linux1>
Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
References: <20121030150024.GU85698@gentoo.org>
<20121030153613.GA6948@linux1>
<508FFE6C.4070200@gentoo.org>
<20121030163820.GA7141@linux1>
<20121108140723.01ec3444@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-project+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list <gentoo-project.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20121108140723.01ec3444@gentoo.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Archives-Salt: 164adbe5-7fbe-4276-ba8d-9725b8db1347
X-Archives-Hash: 22eb113a3db61ad540939dadcbf98067
--qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 02:07:23PM -0300, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:38:20 -0500
> William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org> wrote:
>=20
> [...]
> > > The end result of this assumption is that the use of
> > > gen_usr_ldscript() and the move of libs from /usr/lib to /lib will
> > > become deprecated, correct? I think it's pertinent to note this (or
> > > whatever other changes will then be requested/required for Council
> > > to decide on) within this discussion, if not also within the
> > > "plan"..
> >=20
> > On Linux, yes, you are correct. I wouldn't propose touching it for the
> > *bsd platforms.
> >=20
> > Also, once everyone switches over, this deprecation would be
> > transparent. The calls to gen_usr_ldscript would be removed from
> > ebuilds where possible, and the function itself could be disabled on
> > linux. Once this is done, when packages are rebuilt, the libraries
> > would migrate back to /usr/lib.
>=20
>=20
> (I hadn't seen that thread.)
>=20
> Removing it from ebuilds implies touching it for *bsd platforms. A lot
> of ebuilds are shared between the g/*bsd and g/linux port, that's
> somewhat the point of the whole thing. Of course, there may be
> linux-only packages where the calls to gen_usr_ldscript will become
> useless, but in general these calls should remain and the function
> shall be a no-op on platforms where this is desired.
=20
That's what I said. The calls could be removed "where possible",
meaning linux-only ebuilds. You can tell from the KEYWORDS which
ebuilds this would apply to. :-)
William
--qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlCb7g4ACgkQblQW9DDEZTiA6wCgkiV4nsU630KRUC1ma78BSukT
6KwAnA71bCCIP2BMH55x5e8Zho9NEdmN
=IHSj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk--