From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7B741381F3 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 18:02:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6989221C050 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 18:02:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-f181.google.com (mail-ob0-f181.google.com [209.85.214.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22F0C21C00A for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 17:38:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f181.google.com with SMTP id ta14so591196obb.40 for ; Thu, 08 Nov 2012 09:38:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=Cxn+tG+jcijR3WoUsTz1ldc4u75qFF4tlzJ3iwWjUI0=; b=i+WRAeJqyI0qdendE32WYjgrc9tPpNkZpasO8mHZO3G/93YiRhZXfSu2luTq6FKR/H up84w5NL+uSxFSeg6Ja6kc1h9i9d36Z8nylcsTYF2zcZjfXB22lH4zMt4S4qjljnSbvk WxJH4FrKAMzD3d2YSALl4WtXPi5Oqfxl53kQqomfz8QJeeQ+B2KpRorWoneYRqDZ/Xqe qbLdZAQwkQCd/eIOBE3fQxtM8khmmAiqs97Kq9BYkWu/dE5VBwGzAhVdbfvzs8+TyUZr b1MTJ25pnCvVFnEH+gGDdGScmxV1J4emr30Qg2A6vptGl2qcoIz6scqAWxcnPNSA1/9e fcXA== Received: by 10.60.9.42 with SMTP id w10mr5726147oea.78.1352396308216; Thu, 08 Nov 2012 09:38:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-187-95-60.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.95.60]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z1sm5846974oeh.7.2012.11.08.09.38.23 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 08 Nov 2012 09:38:25 -0800 (PST) Sender: William Hubbs Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 08 Nov 2012 11:38:22 -0600 Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 11:38:22 -0600 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 13-11-2012 Message-ID: <20121108173822.GA3842@linux1> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org References: <20121030150024.GU85698@gentoo.org> <20121030153613.GA6948@linux1> <508FFE6C.4070200@gentoo.org> <20121030163820.GA7141@linux1> <20121108140723.01ec3444@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121108140723.01ec3444@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: 164adbe5-7fbe-4276-ba8d-9725b8db1347 X-Archives-Hash: 22eb113a3db61ad540939dadcbf98067 --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 02:07:23PM -0300, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:38:20 -0500 > William Hubbs wrote: >=20 > [...] > > > The end result of this assumption is that the use of > > > gen_usr_ldscript() and the move of libs from /usr/lib to /lib will > > > become deprecated, correct? I think it's pertinent to note this (or > > > whatever other changes will then be requested/required for Council > > > to decide on) within this discussion, if not also within the > > > "plan".. > >=20 > > On Linux, yes, you are correct. I wouldn't propose touching it for the > > *bsd platforms. > >=20 > > Also, once everyone switches over, this deprecation would be > > transparent. The calls to gen_usr_ldscript would be removed from > > ebuilds where possible, and the function itself could be disabled on > > linux. Once this is done, when packages are rebuilt, the libraries > > would migrate back to /usr/lib. >=20 >=20 > (I hadn't seen that thread.) >=20 > Removing it from ebuilds implies touching it for *bsd platforms. A lot > of ebuilds are shared between the g/*bsd and g/linux port, that's > somewhat the point of the whole thing. Of course, there may be > linux-only packages where the calls to gen_usr_ldscript will become > useless, but in general these calls should remain and the function > shall be a no-op on platforms where this is desired. =20 That's what I said. The calls could be removed "where possible", meaning linux-only ebuilds. You can tell from the KEYWORDS which ebuilds this would apply to. :-) William --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlCb7g4ACgkQblQW9DDEZTiA6wCgkiV4nsU630KRUC1ma78BSukT 6KwAnA71bCCIP2BMH55x5e8Zho9NEdmN =IHSj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk--