From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A81391381F3 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 18:02:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 768F821C00A for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 18:02:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F52421C008 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 16:31:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (pc-96-46-101-190.cm.vtr.net [190.101.46.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: aballier) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 83B3133D89E; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 16:31:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 13:30:53 -0300 From: Alexis Ballier To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Cc: grobian@gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Council meeting: Tuesday 11 November 2012, 19:00 UTC Message-ID: <20121108133053.6937c1b4@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20121106212816.GE82762@gentoo.org> References: <20121106212816.GE82762@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.13; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 5ff2ac6e-7928-4edf-87bb-ea1cb23934e5 X-Archives-Hash: b84ab9414baff8822b0483df08268427 On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 22:28:16 +0100 Fabian Groffen wrote: > 2. Handling separate /usr support[1] (15 minutes) > - approve/disapprove plan (forcing everyone to take action, and > implement one of the two "supported" solutions) Note: not every bootable gentoo system is linux + udev based (or whatever is the reason for this deprecation). From what I know, FreeBSD has no plan to deprecate separate /usr and neither does our Gentoo/FreeBSD port. > - approve/disapprove removal of gen_usr_ldscript I'm not sure what you meant here, but if that meant 'make it a no-op on systems where it makes sense', then fine by me. Otherwise, please keep in mind that removing it will also affect g/fbsd where this is still needed in order to have a sane / and /usr separation.