From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1471E138010 for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2012 09:02:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 792DDE0507 for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2012 09:02:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from amun.cheops.ods.org (amun.cheops.ods.org [83.161.135.166]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E23B6E030B for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2012 06:28:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nut.cheops.ods.org ([2001:888:1022:0:ca2a:14ff:fe35:7a00] helo=gentoo.org) by amun.cheops.ods.org with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1TK1P2-0001aq-RZ for gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2012 08:28:54 +0200 Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 08:28:51 +0200 From: Fabian Groffen To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 09-10-2012 Message-ID: <20121005062851.GI912@gentoo.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org References: <20120925092414.GL37574@gentoo.org> <1348601570.3603.4.camel@belkin4> <20121002113020.GZ37574@gentoo.org> <1349284689.2200.50.camel@belkin4> <1349375561.2200.57.camel@belkin4> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="z3clA4SBh6LNYU5e" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1349375561.2200.57.camel@belkin4> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (Darwin 11.4.2, VIM - Vi IMproved 7.3) Organization: Gentoo Foundation, Inc. X-Content-Scanned: by amun.cheops.ods.org (Exim Exiscan) using SpamAssassin and ClamAV X-Archives-Salt: 3a1b2202-47cc-496b-b633-a5adfa4f23f9 X-Archives-Hash: 677e1f14e76de59062cf4c46f496a605 --z3clA4SBh6LNYU5e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 04-10-2012 20:32:41 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > And what about current usage in the tree with current eapis? Regarding > > IUSE_FLATTENED I have no problem with it, but will need to talk with > > portage team also as they have the current implementation >=20 > And then, I think council should clarify what to do with current usages > in the tree with eapi0-4 Why should the Council clarify that? (Not that we're unwilling, but I don't see why Council should be the initiator here.) --=20 Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level --z3clA4SBh6LNYU5e Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAlBufiMACgkQX3X2B8XHTolQYwCfa16uqs/TntmPY7v7+mYivzRn Rf0AnRH7oN9peeefNF+xXcOOZwmgWVi6 =fYZR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --z3clA4SBh6LNYU5e--