From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A2C6138010 for ; Wed, 3 Oct 2012 06:02:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C3806E0281 for ; Wed, 3 Oct 2012 06:02:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21895E01DC for ; Wed, 3 Oct 2012 05:04:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (c-75-73-165-249.hsd1.mn.comcast.net [75.73.165.249]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: dberkholz) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4CC9733C3B4 for ; Wed, 3 Oct 2012 05:04:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 00:04:46 -0500 From: Donnie Berkholz To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 09-10-2012 Message-ID: <20121003050446.GB6508@comet.hsd1.mn.comcast.net> References: <20120925092414.GL37574@gentoo.org> <20577.32914.7474.976710@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20579.61409.451891.521881@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20120927221336.GB9751@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0ntfKIWw70PvrIHh" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120927221336.GB9751@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: 546c7d1e-2d88-4687-bb50-14f8f9448365 X-Archives-Hash: 2b1a1655f87b045f3acd8ab1496c0091 --0ntfKIWw70PvrIHh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 15:13 Thu 27 Sep , Brian Harring wrote: > What for? So someone can name their package foo-1? Is that really=20 > such a major gap we're willing to induce breakage? >=20 > Will anyone even !@#*ing use a package names foo-1? I've yet to see=20 > an example given, just ignoring of the breakage it will induce. I tend to agree. What value does this provide? It creates additional=20 work for no proven real-world benefit. --=20 Thanks, Donnie Donnie Berkholz Council Member / Sr. Developer, Gentoo Linux Analyst, RedMonk --0ntfKIWw70PvrIHh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAlBrx24ACgkQXVaO67S1rtu9EQCghDFYjwrPCUmgL4HEEvRpCKBb imgAn3zvtt6RuJq+rB0hRGmGUzsG3OwC =ahya -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0ntfKIWw70PvrIHh--