From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 982AF138010 for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 12:02:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2ACDDE0329 for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 12:02:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hera.cwi.nl (hera.cwi.nl [192.16.191.8]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ADA0E02DF for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 11:30:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gentoo.org (sofia.ins.cwi.nl [192.16.196.188]) by hera.cwi.nl with ESMTP id q92BULXM015089 for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 13:30:21 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 13:30:20 +0200 From: Fabian Groffen To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 09-10-2012 Message-ID: <20121002113020.GZ37574@gentoo.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org References: <20120925092414.GL37574@gentoo.org> <1348601570.3603.4.camel@belkin4> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="n2RoZOfqketZuWCG" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1348601570.3603.4.camel@belkin4> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (Darwin 9.8.0, VIM - Vi IMproved 7.3) Organization: Gentoo Foundation, Inc. X-Archives-Salt: 79ebeaf7-7dd5-4497-85bd-6f0a816462f8 X-Archives-Hash: c824367e9ae74deada5c0f21aa55d29e --n2RoZOfqketZuWCG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Pacho, On 25-09-2012 21:32:50 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote: > This is from: > http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/260662 >=20 > But corrected to remember preferred usage of in_iuse from eutils.eclass > as remembered by mgorny in that thread: I've considered your point, but concluded that at this moment, the Council basically has nothing to do here. It seems obvious that it needs something to be defined in a next EAPI, but the Council is not the body to invent that. Please discuss with involved people (Portage devs?) and prepare a patch to PMS that can be used as feature for the next EAPI. Brian's IUSE_FLATTENED might be a simple and good solution for that. Best, Fabian --=20 Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level --n2RoZOfqketZuWCG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAlBq0EwACgkQX3X2B8XHTolWVwCePXiTw+k7LIDNpi5YnAfV+xvf PlQAoJQXpCzaOJ4zhg3q4TC1W+jo/IG8 =dlaj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --n2RoZOfqketZuWCG--