On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:11:55 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > > Whichever route we go, there's also the UI question: how do we > > present this to users in a sensible way? > > The intent is not to anything clever but just mask the package. Intel > users don't want mesa without support for their card; they simply > don't want the broken version at all. > > It should be presented alike regular package.mask, with the whole > atom string. I'm not sure that it's that simple: what if a user has, say, intel turned on only because it's on by default in profiles? -- Ciaran McCreesh