From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BEB41381F4 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 00:03:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D642D21C0A0 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 00:03:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com (mail-we0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D75F21C12B for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 22:03:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by weyt57 with SMTP id t57so697757wey.40 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 15:03:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; bh=cve7CAwWi0vHl9/ZXIo/mgc3+YR6qg5vL8Tb1F2XNnc=; b=sIPeESx/fG26Lpj1WxPDdmYyZxMDvfjd7YGr6Cqb460uUXFkcbg9zeD39UQ+MCJvUG B1OXDnccQk2t/D+aiIvQ4FRYC4Ikj21/y88CCFgKHmAQ/hrBug8r3YYVhtfIXVjB7Tlj 5IRLZlUCrOqVr5tkAOlN0gL9y0ygbHuBfjggMlGGD7Vq2R2MPjNVbikFMz/uDlkT5T0N rgv4aXXNY/owF6L3hGH8H+0lvoREPNisYQB29DYS6VimpfcMdHILXaKVvp0iORCgJpp1 ptQf3lsx3p+dV1IM8WBvQPo9xfa4nRwJgkggIJX6Yf0n5hLeVeBDm3K7yp3TpGvGgCoD 6WDA== Received: by 10.180.81.193 with SMTP id c1mr31366535wiy.12.1344981800634; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 15:03:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc13-broo7-2-0-cust130.14-2.cable.virginmedia.com. [82.9.16.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k2sm36096417wiz.7.2012.08.14.15.03.19 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 14 Aug 2012 15:03:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 23:02:04 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Council meeting: Tuesday 14 August 2012, 19:00 UTC Message-ID: <20120814230204.1eada549@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <502AC963.5040000@gentoo.org> References: <20120807191736.GF49719@gentoo.org> <20520.6784.427242.325755@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20522.23125.717981.676275@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <201208142318.01431.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <20120814223556.780b481d@googlemail.com> <502AC963.5040000@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.11; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/XTVGs=gIqlrC/ty2jnVsZoh"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 7ec463e7-0cdb-49f5-a465-00de056ff918 X-Archives-Hash: 873ae6b676d48314cbf2218d479a97d6 --Sig_/XTVGs=gIqlrC/ty2jnVsZoh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:55:47 -0700 Zac Medico wrote: > It seems like there's some confusion here. Approving a new EAPI and > deciding to use a new EAPI in a given profile are two entirely > different things. If we want to us a new EAPI in a profile, we just > have to deploy it such that users are only exposed to that profile > when they consciously running `eselect profile` (and they can always > revert back to the previous profile if it turns out that their > installed package manager doesn't support the new profile). There's still the issue that we haven't decided what [use] deps do when they show up in profile files. We were sticking at 1 until we worked that out. (Personally I'm in favour of just not allowing use deps anywhere in profiles, and requiring package manglers to enforce it.) --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/XTVGs=gIqlrC/ty2jnVsZoh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlAqyuAACgkQ96zL6DUtXhFTUwCdFCO6fFIs/32LOpzmZ/bLdzRd b6gAn36uB0IruKWdZx1dz1+vYJnMLXfM =LP9X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/XTVGs=gIqlrC/ty2jnVsZoh--