From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23CBE1381F4 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:04:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AEB4CE07AE for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:04:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com (mail-we0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC6C6E073E for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:25:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by weyt57 with SMTP id t57so128264wey.40 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 02:25:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; bh=nYl7BVAVeCndpI5VIoP/eCnymWu+F1R6gWAQKVfduHw=; b=v2mUv/tXfxPzhcfy8o/D+piPAQ9NuBzjG2OtaygedPNb6UQVum168MhUctp6j18vaB 26QArVeEEKg6BSWL7VIT5jvmCurDsKQowP1D+PyR1bMVRuG6sixq/um0GKzaKkSpmB65 HuaNXoLEpF+y7xhdGHbVIwh1UtBxltYIpUDQ9FMyQ6PkuE+K1sAy/HM/ZLw0eKWBC38g 2RGHoZ6nTIwRz88/iquhQX1WAPywF6Xg5Oatf8WB0EO2XeQM1+PaYvcVvJVRtHPdAyXB NRaX8jeEMKysMXrWRtdR+sZfI8etIVkcSG+I552lKyEAKXVxagwOnfJm8Zskk3z010Er gqWA== Received: by 10.180.109.166 with SMTP id ht6mr26248822wib.11.1344936348057; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 02:25:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc13-broo7-2-0-cust130.14-2.cable.virginmedia.com. [82.9.16.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j6sm31263707wiy.4.2012.08.14.02.25.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 14 Aug 2012 02:25:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:24:30 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Council meeting: Tuesday 14 August 2012, 19:00 UTC Message-ID: <20120814102430.261446bc@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <201208140902.03536.Arfrever.FTA@gmail.com> References: <20120807191736.GF49719@gentoo.org> <20520.6784.427242.325755@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <201208140902.03536.Arfrever.FTA@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.11; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/eYsxVThIX._p6q8DFgQ6UIE"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 002719fa-e9f8-485a-9b66-fc4fa8d2ab43 X-Archives-Hash: 9f1e00b8c2ed67b6a17392ee2040ee2e --Sig_/eYsxVThIX._p6q8DFgQ6UIE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:02:02 +0200 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > * package.mask, use.force, use.mask, package.use, package.use.force > and package.use.mask directories > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D282296 > * make.defaults, use.force, use.mask, package.use, package.use.force > and package.use.mask in ${repository_path}/profiles > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D414817 These two need a profiles EAPI bump, and we've not discussed what happens when profiles go over EAPI 1 yet. > * REPOSITORY variable > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D414813 >=20 > * Repository dependencies > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D414815 These two are widely considered undesirable. The second one also has a rather large "we don't agree on what it means, but whatever it means it isn't want you naively want" issue. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/eYsxVThIX._p6q8DFgQ6UIE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlAqGVEACgkQ96zL6DUtXhHGlwCgsWbR+bhWV5jUWQ6GCpbXtxaN urQAniWEp93GMTqPQrEY3F+BHdBT3w87 =xi8C -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/eYsxVThIX._p6q8DFgQ6UIE--