From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B53381381F4 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 00:03:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D106E073F for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 00:03:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A6F8E06D7 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 21:12:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (87-205-57-138.adsl.inetia.pl [87.205.57.138]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EE3FA1B401D; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 21:12:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 23:13:09 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Cc: ulm@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Council meeting: Tuesday 14 August 2012, 19:00 UTC Message-ID: <20120812231309.1debb8ac@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <20520.6784.427242.325755@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> References: <20120807191736.GF49719@gentoo.org> <20520.6784.427242.325755@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.11; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; boundary="Sig_/G6ESAoj8sHJRZo_aCw3ngxa"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: be6d628a-f151-4143-922b-e5bbdc2e69b0 X-Archives-Hash: 03fd93340a120ac00920c63de3a81ecd --Sig_/G6ESAoj8sHJRZo_aCw3ngxa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 23:05:04 +0200 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > * User patches > - Current wording of the spec requires that every ebuild includes a > call to the apply_user_patches_here function in src_prepare. > A alternative would be to apply user patches after src_prepare as > a default, if the ebuild doesn't call the respective function. > - Are we happy with the name apply_user_patches_here? > (epatch_user? euserpatch?) > http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=3Dproj/pms.git;a=3Dcommit;h=3D= a8bf7862967cce36b7f1b408934a774126da2538< I would like to add one more point here: - The spec doesn't provide any kind of epatch function, so we will end up having two copies of epatch, one for user patches, and the other (from eclass) for ebuilds. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/G6ESAoj8sHJRZo_aCw3ngxa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iJsEAQEIAAYFAlAoHGgACgkQfXuS5UK5QB165gP2OJYB/wqaX2MDJ61VKy2vcG7x urAUHs+3y6R0hUk1NvI0ALS6+vhbteemePjSCgDm4Dt+j3r1b+yaY+DrE/VVU0hU Aknmm5FxFAM8LAR+nN0C/wJiTx+UwoOXXeopF/2e0Lij068T6Fy28oV50dOuIlFx YGhnciyT4LRvsJF4+A== =78V0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/G6ESAoj8sHJRZo_aCw3ngxa--