From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SbCKZ-0005Nh-7O for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 15:02:59 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CDF8DE068C for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 15:02:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com (mail-we0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73AB6E0833 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 12:41:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by werj55 with SMTP id j55so2637771wer.40 for ; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 05:41:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; bh=1irnMLF7gmzoWvvliz2SnftjOUQZ0JgsM9PDedscPFM=; b=kU8AsLvOFEy69oA3mGde2XsrHL0PWbemOS62yGYWcZFs24Y5a/dAtJRKrbWlAOzzRV tQU7TzEHZr4al2LRvHBARXjbjD0/v9/ZF9DVrjxIANdp4IlCpmRmnSU4XhhMariwfuGt ASRwUdpgIW8eFmg/pGnuARu4on9L8nbVeLlSbnqI8HY9uFLU7CEhuGi4Z/EsMja614SD xov3v02nKx5PBUnKJvPpv/MUJZDtkax+b5xhX7fYNFS4srhtrlMpeyDZD7ZgNM9kjNsC nOaRG/4wqVUWqPv5RxilfpiVGgTK9NpjX7fouFE5JvJC0UQiklzZ8q5oHYhC5+DzSFJa buSg== Received: by 10.216.218.230 with SMTP id k80mr7813304wep.39.1338727312701; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 05:41:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc13-broo7-2-0-cust130.14-2.cable.virginmedia.com. [82.9.16.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q6sm12766175wiy.0.2012.06.03.05.41.51 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 03 Jun 2012 05:41:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2012 13:38:32 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2012-06-12 Message-ID: <20120603133832.4c5cf6cf@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <4FCB3195.6070601@gentoo.org> References: <4FCAA2F3.1070309@gentoo.org> <20426.43332.37753.819773@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <4FCAD7F3.9010101@gentoo.org> <20427.11568.311193.372525@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <4FCB3195.6070601@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/1IftFb1gGP1Xjs=kBVdEKxf"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: a8aacbd5-f4bd-4204-943b-f10cf1037d26 X-Archives-Hash: 91836c0fa7e51e4531ee8fdf226c97b5 --Sig_/1IftFb1gGP1Xjs=kBVdEKxf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 03 Jun 2012 12:42:45 +0300 Samuli Suominen wrote: > When all there is required is dropping some "$@" to the Portage code > and be done with it, and have everything be in consistent format... The question is not about the code, but about the design. Your design doesn't make sense: there's no direct correspondence between functions and phases, so it's not obvious where arguments to "default" get sent. "default" is for the easy cases. If you're wanting to do something different, don't use it. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/1IftFb1gGP1Xjs=kBVdEKxf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk/LWssACgkQ96zL6DUtXhENBwCg4rK/Uadsg4MUqhCSSfc5WfLb EsoAoKvvBPGkcf4w3T08IsDTWoqJRAMa =ude0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/1IftFb1gGP1Xjs=kBVdEKxf--