From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SQjJl-0006qj-9i for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 05 May 2012 18:02:54 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D8A93E0941 for ; Sat, 5 May 2012 18:02:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-f181.google.com (mail-ob0-f181.google.com [209.85.214.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA3D9E0796 for ; Sat, 5 May 2012 15:56:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbuo19 with SMTP id uo19so6930875obb.40 for ; Sat, 05 May 2012 08:56:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=QoxxMDjv2twTTaljEqK18TKK3GOPuifSogy8Ff3Lrxs=; b=QmuAffRTOO4HAo+/QaUojY1/NQGu19aCQUuYO1Do3PYv6ZHSk5SzwW83BclNzwzq0G /DBevxJpyHcJmAGt+D82a93yCR04qA+0PMLxjosAl7eYyM3wChCrqBanIghZ/EKy/tJL FWS9LY16U01N24+YFiY6gUkQJl3wR68uuOrvPxUSHgKVEVCKbLbKEW6f29NGqnpwwjZp cf6hUb+wSKZ0ffMZgg6Wfc95cvg3zDx+BsF5rT7KvhnGPTXCiy2x2nfBtSbJhQkXlM56 usnih436gatoSCCFJsoYsUpIRTLeFiJO9wggmNYnuDZ4jviF7R1imqmd5fOuhFwjZuBI p5jg== Received: by 10.60.2.198 with SMTP id 6mr13813841oew.34.1336233382031; Sat, 05 May 2012 08:56:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-187-77-158.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.77.158]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id lq4sm12566563obb.12.2012.05.05.08.56.19 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 05 May 2012 08:56:21 -0700 (PDT) Sender: William Hubbs Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 05 May 2012 10:56:19 -0500 Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 10:56:19 -0500 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Council meeting: Tuesday 8th May 2012, 19:00 UTC Message-ID: <20120505155619.GA3496@linux1> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org References: <4FA095CE.3070701@gentoo.org> <20120504230637.GA2183@linux1> <201205042046.22210.vapier@gentoo.org> <20120505024134.GA4666@linux1> <20120505032500.GA4720@linux1> <20120505053213.GB2134@linux1> <20120505083238.GE54691@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/04w6evG8XlLl3ft" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120505083238.GE54691@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: 8abe447f-90c6-4c18-8506-b1b43c2d2021 X-Archives-Hash: 2375207b8abe42acf3f7158b893cf9bb --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Fabian, On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 10:32:38AM +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote: > On 05-05-2012 00:32:13 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > [snip] > > ... you must either: > >=20 > > 1) follow the initramfs guide and start using an initramfs or > > 2) emerge busybox with the sep-usr use flag on and follow the > > instructions you receive. > >=20 > > My personal opinion is that we should not mandate one option over the > > other, and this is now the only question I feel needs to be clarified. >=20 > I don't feel we should mandate anything. >=20 > I feel the previous vote was about intentions, not about an actual > implementation. Ok, that's the main reason I brought this up again; I was sort of feeling otherwise and apparently others were also. When I read the meeting log, some of the conversation looked like the council was not only stating that separate /usr was a valid configuration but mandating that we had to support it a certain way. If that's not the case, there is really not anything else to discuss for this. :-) William --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk+lTaMACgkQblQW9DDEZTgkeACeI/+EKzJK6JtQ8VLmUSAmJLoc svIAn22LDfqAjZJMtjuhx1RZKZSF8o72 =gQS4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft--