From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SOjhp-0007jU-NT for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 06:03:30 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D7F4EE0905 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 06:03:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-f181.google.com (mail-ob0-f181.google.com [209.85.214.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95E28E07A7 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 04:17:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbun3 with SMTP id un3so4093011obb.40 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 21:17:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=QfpMfQjMZQEMZeFoHVJZnuEpOElNdTwQJEZEFWkk300=; b=Ie+JTmU7ZxXm4F73QM3yc5vlf+gOJc5MjYMtfzkPrW6uGKVcOQfelD6NwXJwoEjOi4 1Q7ZHGpyGLpnS2TFI97UfmbWmTanqc2hGonNQ1imB0e/+WLCff7USwP6JQqWNQLV5td1 eetTJqKvaqklPgy/ryDDsH8yqbyv+c0L8vpnfYTmPxBsqkNUEpfKme4sRdsGUTUD77iw bJ1wYPuWK8ZMnz9yeHmfyPkW5nN1Xph4yN8QNsxZBJvH7rWAwD7YFbU6Gkag3mHgDJ1T qFo2D4M3e8GkOUWQLP30VQYbO3EkzVPfx2P45Iv5K6UDwnWAek+ZU4oWv3Ru9Q2OXdW6 f+XA== Received: by 10.182.119.33 with SMTP id kr1mr638234obb.60.1335759475873; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 21:17:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-187-77-158.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.77.158]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id il8sm15432494obc.18.2012.04.29.21.17.53 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 29 Apr 2012 21:17:55 -0700 (PDT) Sender: William Hubbs Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 29 Apr 2012 23:17:52 -0500 Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 23:17:52 -0500 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2012-05-08 Message-ID: <20120430041752.GA11562@linux1> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org References: <20120424182141.GQ10282@gentoo.org> <20120424195622.GA6572@linux1> <4F97212D.4050407@gentoo.org> <20120424222600.GA7074@linux1> <20120425033445.GA7542@linux1> <20120427071306.GT10282@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120427071306.GT10282@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: 33301792-6805-43a5-9050-60054145edfa X-Archives-Hash: 59e1d4dc67966f8b5a97b8c7bdc339d1 --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline First off, we are not talking about Gnome OS. I personally am not a gnome user; I have know idea how to use it. Also, I have /usr on a separate partition. I was against this change initially, but after thinking about it, it makes a lot of sense. This is the first issue we are talking about [1], and if you read it over, you will see that gnome isn't driving this. Regarding the case for the /usr merge, it again has nothing to do with gnome. It is a simplification of the filesystem layout which offers some compelling advantages [2]. As someone else said in this thread, I have never seen a "case against the /usr merge" explaining why it shouldn't happen. William [1] http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken [2] http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/TheCaseForTheUsrMerge --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk+eEnAACgkQblQW9DDEZThRMACgkgjbSUGs5zqCvZNIo8Bo3Z0W UQwAnA2F/cIqVh+CKEY/RHZVHqZHJGzh =Ny8x -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1--