From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SMpiW-0008SR-1d for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:04:20 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A242AE07AA for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:04:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-f181.google.com (mail-ob0-f181.google.com [209.85.214.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E806E07D8 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 22:26:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbun3 with SMTP id un3so1759665obb.40 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:26:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=/EKPXmuPtRMZKcyYQsdR0wQImIT0M0l5uAnvkFykvSY=; b=wwBLPhLdjS5+rTmCP7iEHofiK/3XLH8LBdscqJHAMczT4e9MuCxrNl/jKlLt55+k64 xHFjL89V/t09f2BneiP3VR6MpUZUy6W5EaUU6tIkUVKi2/8O66Jaybra2uJieovnxVKk Op0bQzgmhhD7xLOKOgVj4+a46sn/RT20r5h37kgqRih6QY+OE20uem+6E05LImnPihg2 k9mYmwSI0lHQCNLfPhuWI/S281DP8snLT88yB3mIs1i8PMaBRcrOfm58FOdg9gHc/3pP YME5nnS8fNYr9Q8osa/vtisZEXCCXT1HUy1TPs3SKHQpDslYNAacsrKr+jHem5a9MwWg YVIQ== Received: by 10.182.141.9 with SMTP id rk9mr101075obb.50.1335306362902; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:26:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-187-77-158.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.77.158]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d9sm21868072obz.6.2012.04.24.15.26.01 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:26:02 -0700 (PDT) Sender: William Hubbs Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:26:00 -0500 Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:26:00 -0500 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2012-05-08 Message-ID: <20120424222600.GA7074@linux1> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org References: <20120424182141.GQ10282@gentoo.org> <20120424195622.GA6572@linux1> <4F97212D.4050407@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F97212D.4050407@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: 5f1c4c9a-fe9f-41ee-8775-8699a7c02478 X-Archives-Hash: d1ea0b9e702b3bf74238d6525bada872 --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:54:53PM +0100, Markos Chandras wrote: > I > was very confused the first time this topic was brought to the > Council. I still believe this is not something we (Council) should > decide but rather the udev maintainers should decide themselves. In > any case, I am fine with bringing this issue back to Council as it > seems there is a general confusion in the Gentoo community about this. Honestly, I agree with you. I am a udev maintainer myself, and the udev maintainers did not bring this issue to council. More than that, no one, that I recall, discussed any ramifications of this vote with any udev maintainers before bringing it to council. The ramifications, as I said in my previous email, are not just udev related (see the section in my previous email about the /usr merge). Once we start implementing the /usr merge, it will not matter whether you use udev or not, you will have to have an initramfs if your /usr is separate. William --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk+XKHgACgkQblQW9DDEZTgkjQCeO54MnJ/tVc4M59xBZKfhq7MH jHMAoI2MDW1V5jOqJgzwzyoxI0bvl04e =NSyl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd--