From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SHiCo-000638-Ed for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:02:26 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F50AE0B59 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:02:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gy0-f181.google.com (mail-gy0-f181.google.com [209.85.160.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A38C4E09BE for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 20:03:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ghbz13 with SMTP id z13so157076ghb.40 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:03:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=t+wVLqYqzigCroQRUNo0d5ShpfZzZYIq37cRQ6TNSic=; b=T7UjMT3C6A3f2Pi2zCQMCZCY3knJuiCJhdojC+On3Ra7cAoCyBRgZZxbq+FUFxdO3m IdUaj6Ff90vZ1xaoBOcrcmbrJczY1+J/V+q0HfaJQQpqKkErI/QRwpt68iNafgoUdEr9 4b3oWf0VTY2UtQoNBs1RF457GW8cbSZikn1aB+J/HF4P5ve+yJdznxCepc0F/a89eL4v BBq0R+n7p+XwwYYqpUZkGM21szLk3w5RiwTpNNs66dW9bg26mavda1Nz5MsPhOK5CDOo ClWpeB7R08pEjOqJT0g/jfpzD3UdbjW9zr+rqzsFIdtpFr8HF5opub13KaYSDeF8FOgc /HzA== Received: by 10.60.5.231 with SMTP id v7mr17474209oev.61.1334088189796; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:03:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-187-77-158.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.77.158]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id aj16sm349763oec.4.2012.04.10.13.03.08 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:03:09 -0700 (PDT) Sender: William Hubbs Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:03:07 -0500 Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:03:07 -0500 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Council meeting: Tuesday 3 April 2012, 19:00 UTC Message-ID: <20120410200307.GA9006@linux1> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org References: <1332972814.6980.1@NeddySeagoon> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1332972814.6980.1@NeddySeagoon> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: 6a580728-6c25-420e-ae63-67d35ba68ccd X-Archives-Hash: 8bc59b2822bc49c3c626cb128db89162 --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 11:13:34PM +0100, Roy Bamford wrote: > I really don't want any autoblackmagic involved in the booting of my=20 > systems. If I don't understand it I can't fix it when (not if) it=20 > breaks.=20 >=20 > I have separate /usr everywhere and most places raid and lvm, so I=20 > already have initrds most places. I will reluctantly move to an initrd=20 > everywhere - but only if I can roll it by hand, so I can fix it by hand= =20 > too. You could; there would be nothing stopping you from rolling your own initramfs. William --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk+EkfsACgkQblQW9DDEZTjhLACfWnaGRaN2TBCFERnSSSBudFDg UisAn047yg0Bhn2DNpc7dMwiA2XUgC95 =zuIi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx--