From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ru9E7-0004Wr-VO for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 21:02:24 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8EDE6E07B3 for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2012 21:02:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from amun.cheops.ods.org (amun.cheops.ods.org [83.161.135.166]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A8BEE06D8 for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2012 20:10:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nut.cheops.ods.org ([2001:888:1022:0:ca2a:14ff:fe35:7a00] helo=gentoo.org) by amun.cheops.ods.org with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Ru8QH-0000dh-Ee for gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 21:11:02 +0100 Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 21:10:48 +0100 From: Fabian Groffen To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2012-02-14 Message-ID: <20120205201048.GA944@gentoo.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org References: <20120202085502.GO28136@gentoo.org> <20120205185613.GS71369@gentoo.org> <4F2ED7EC.1050301@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F2ED7EC.1050301@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (Darwin 11.3.0, VIM - Vi IMproved 7.3) Organization: Gentoo Foundation, Inc. X-Content-Scanned: by amun.cheops.ods.org (Exim Exiscan) using SpamAssassin and ClamAV X-Archives-Salt: af7e1a10-fefd-45a4-a47e-20d7619dd32e X-Archives-Hash: 51e1c9a1dfab7ffab797b9a7e0d7024c --PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 05-02-2012 19:26:36 +0000, Markos Chandras wrote: > > I'd like to discuss the recently received email on "official > > permission to promote Gentoo on Facebook as Gentoo Linux Poland > > group", and in particular whether this is something for the > > Council, or for the trustees instead. >=20 > I am sure there are many Gentoo "Friends" websites out there and I > don't think all of them ever asked us to do it. I don't think it is a > problem for us to solve as it is impossible ( and clearly undesirable > ) to manage these sites separately. However, we need to protect > Gentoo's name in case we spot a bad PR from a so-called Official > Gentoo website out there :) As Rich answered, it's a Trustees thing. > Shouldn't PR be part of this discussion as well? I'd say it is > actually their job. Council's role is mainly technical directions in > Gentoo and PR is not our responsibility or area of expertise I must say. You hit the nail on its head. Can the Council think of any technical issues/solutions that can help to disseminate. Further, I think we should delegate the original mail to the Trustees and PR, or proxy for them. --=20 Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level --PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAk8u4kgACgkQX3X2B8XHTokVYwCdGK+Wa6SETNTk6HrpKVxGqBAJ PmkAnjqSoUp745XejO2Qt/crelPCBWoX =1q48 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9--