From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RJK5W-0006QH-5L for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 07:09:18 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CD28D21C0C9; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 07:09:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from amun.cheops.ods.org (amun.cheops.ods.org [83.161.135.166]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B848921C098 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 07:08:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nut.cheops.ods.org ([2001:888:1022:0:ca2a:14ff:fe35:7a00] helo=gentoo.org) by amun.cheops.ods.org with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1RJK5B-0004YU-6E for gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 09:08:59 +0200 Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 09:08:56 +0200 From: Fabian Groffen To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2011-11-08 Message-ID: <20111027070856.GM843@gentoo.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org References: <20111026163724.GB843@gentoo.org> <20111026184927.255ed3bb@pomiocik.lan> <20111026170607.GF843@gentoo.org> <20111026191124.411c1f00@pomiocik.lan> <20111026171554.GG843@gentoo.org> <1319652305.5300.7.camel@belkin4> <20111026205843.GH843@gentoo.org> <4EA875AB.6000404@gentoo.org> <20111026210705.GJ843@gentoo.org> <4EA88615.7050904@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NAmEGxWO5R/hjhRw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4EA88615.7050904@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (Darwin 11.2.0, VIM - Vi IMproved 7.3) Organization: Gentoo Foundation, Inc. X-Content-Scanned: by amun.cheops.ods.org (Exim Exiscan) using SpamAssassin and ClamAV X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 2acbb0e568b3e74b03760a3323779ce3 --NAmEGxWO5R/hjhRw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 27-10-2011 00:13:41 +0200, Ch=C3=AD-Thanh Christopher Nguy=E1=BB=85n wro= te: > Fabian Groffen schrieb: > > On 26-10-2011 23:03:39 +0200, Ch=C3=AD-Thanh Christopher Nguy=E1=BB=85n= wrote: > >> Fabian Groffen schrieb: > >>> You can see it has been removed, but you typically want to know why. > >>> That's the idea of the ChangeLog file. > >> > >> One of the arguments for logging everything in ChangeLog was that > >> extracting this kind information from CVS can be cumbersome. So, I wou= ld > >> not agree with "typically". > >=20 > > I do not see your point. Does my sentence change for you if you remove > > the "typically"? >=20 > If the reason why you want ChangeLogs is avoiding having to get the > information about commit activity from CVS, then the proposal to make > exaclty that the minimal ChangeLog entry seems reasonable. >=20 > If in addition you always want to know about the motivation for the > commit, then it won't be sufficient I guess. But based on the previous > discussion on mandatory ChangeLogs I have not gotten the impression that > this was typically called for. I still don't see your point, sorry. --=20 Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level --NAmEGxWO5R/hjhRw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAk6pA4gACgkQX3X2B8XHTokVBgCdHwV1ioQfrLKk77gi4j4IBOIH Tw0AnAtxgHKdYjbqL0Fnop9MZQz2gNLb =yy2h -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NAmEGxWO5R/hjhRw--