From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-project+bounces-1648-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1RJAh3-0001If-FP
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 21:07:25 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EAE3F21C0B2;
	Wed, 26 Oct 2011 21:07:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from amun.cheops.ods.org (amun.cheops.ods.org [83.161.135.166])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C794921C0B5
	for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 21:07:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from nut.cheops.ods.org ([2001:888:1022:0:ca2a:14ff:fe35:7a00] helo=gentoo.org)
	by amun.cheops.ods.org with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.77)
	(envelope-from <grobian@gentoo.org>)
	id 1RJAgk-0008HA-Ng
	for gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 23:07:08 +0200
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 23:07:05 +0200
From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev] Call for agenda items --
 Council meeting 2011-11-08
Message-ID: <20111026210705.GJ843@gentoo.org>
Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
References: <20111026163025.GA843@gentoo.org>
 <20111026183551.32cfffe8@pomiocik.lan>
 <20111026163724.GB843@gentoo.org>
 <20111026184927.255ed3bb@pomiocik.lan>
 <20111026170607.GF843@gentoo.org>
 <20111026191124.411c1f00@pomiocik.lan>
 <20111026171554.GG843@gentoo.org>
 <1319652305.5300.7.camel@belkin4>
 <20111026205843.GH843@gentoo.org>
 <4EA875AB.6000404@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-project+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list <gentoo-project.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="B6Zh/hwRPruM9rlZ"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4EA875AB.6000404@gentoo.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (Darwin 11.2.0, VIM - Vi IMproved 7.3)
Organization: Gentoo Foundation, Inc.
X-Content-Scanned: by amun.cheops.ods.org (Exim Exiscan) using SpamAssassin and ClamAV
X-Archives-Salt: 
X-Archives-Hash: 6ed466a0725b74afbac4e5f7da4850d6


--B6Zh/hwRPruM9rlZ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 26-10-2011 23:03:39 +0200, Ch=C3=AD-Thanh Christopher Nguy=E1=BB=85n wro=
te:
> Fabian Groffen schrieb:
> > You can see it has been removed, but you typically want to know why.
> > That's the idea of the ChangeLog file.
>=20
> One of the arguments for logging everything in ChangeLog was that
> extracting this kind information from CVS can be cumbersome. So, I would
> not agree with "typically".

I do not see your point.  Does my sentence change for you if you remove
the "typically"?


--=20
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level

--B6Zh/hwRPruM9rlZ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (Darwin)

iEYEARECAAYFAk6odnkACgkQX3X2B8XHTonMHACglfVMPsUGKfIgWU33hAeZrJS3
mNEAn3qEws8A8wb3E8b1VjTjBaOezuI8
=//kQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--B6Zh/hwRPruM9rlZ--