From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RJ70v-0001W4-Pt for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 17:11:42 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D8F9821C052; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 17:11:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65626E0552; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 17:11:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (unknown [87.204.190.233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B6B591B4014; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 17:11:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:11:24 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2011-11-08 Message-ID: <20111026191124.411c1f00@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <20111026170607.GF843@gentoo.org> References: <20111026163025.GA843@gentoo.org> <20111026183551.32cfffe8@pomiocik.lan> <20111026163724.GB843@gentoo.org> <20111026184927.255ed3bb@pomiocik.lan> <20111026170607.GF843@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.7; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; boundary="Sig_/JhwzJfmjW5N9F7nplfWwPpk"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 27be0dfa9dee72c72967df6c0db6ba35 --Sig_/JhwzJfmjW5N9F7nplfWwPpk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:06:07 +0200 Fabian Groffen wrote: > > 3) one step towards preventing useless ChangeLog entries. >=20 > Also this has been discussed and decided upon by the current and > previous Councils, so also that opinion is unlikely to suddenly > change. I meant the useless ChangeLog messages done by developers on purpose like 'ignore this'. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/JhwzJfmjW5N9F7nplfWwPpk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQEIAAYFAk6oPzwACgkQfXuS5UK5QB3QCQP/VZEu89uXKjm6Y+Z5d4EF1A5E ri58FjRMB3LztbqqhQK8D4nsfWoJAiv2IN6tNOxELLUl8tHayLzkLu/oQxnW22IB N13sW7cEI4aSwsGkLtytLqC1irzGRoDCnJICJSTe8ZozqcaxYirW4GYG8wef4lTh e56o0nOv8TSH4aN+A0U= =XjI4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/JhwzJfmjW5N9F7nplfWwPpk--