From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RJ6Sj-0004Nk-1w for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:36:21 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6DDF421C1E5; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:36:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0496B21C05C; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:35:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (unknown [87.204.190.233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 17C611B401A; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:35:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 18:35:51 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: grobian@gentoo.org, gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2011-11-08 Message-ID: <20111026183551.32cfffe8@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <20111026163025.GA843@gentoo.org> References: <20111026163025.GA843@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.7; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; boundary="Sig_/jrgeOZD0_5EopKVIyF9chRK"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 8f1921c86b33bcf5a82a52ae6eb04634 --Sig_/jrgeOZD0_5EopKVIyF9chRK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 18:30:25 +0200 Fabian Groffen wrote: > In less than two weeks, the council will meet again. This is the time > to raise and prepare items that the council should put on the agenda > to vote on. As an extension of ChangeLog topic, I'd like to suggest to require developers to commit packages with matching (same) ChangeLog entries and commit messages. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/jrgeOZD0_5EopKVIyF9chRK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQEIAAYFAk6oNusACgkQfXuS5UK5QB2m5QP/X9b99oh6cibS5WQFUXTcEabD WcAn8zmMhpW+cW0FwnKh2m0vFx92WpOiq3uKnV83iEGSdz+GVksTlcSMlycWTEUd UdKaBbthMc2NUIVeX/3L9m+yHvbAQpaEyiYmZsPSyAXuYWRf9bwCSB6ZZaeYU1tI wEJx8ED9UnRhkFPfqTE= =HwfK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/jrgeOZD0_5EopKVIyF9chRK--