From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RJ6w0-0000mJ-SX for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 17:06:37 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D22C21C21C; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 17:06:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from amun.cheops.ods.org (amun.cheops.ods.org [83.161.135.166]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABA9B21C21B; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 17:06:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nut.cheops.ods.org ([2001:888:1022:0:ca2a:14ff:fe35:7a00] helo=gentoo.org) by amun.cheops.ods.org with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1RJ6vY-0006V9-Dr; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:06:08 +0200 Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:06:07 +0200 From: Fabian Groffen To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2011-11-08 Message-ID: <20111026170607.GF843@gentoo.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org References: <20111026163025.GA843@gentoo.org> <20111026183551.32cfffe8@pomiocik.lan> <20111026163724.GB843@gentoo.org> <20111026184927.255ed3bb@pomiocik.lan> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Zif13CGLAmVnkPyw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111026184927.255ed3bb@pomiocik.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (Darwin 11.2.0, VIM - Vi IMproved 7.3) Organization: Gentoo Foundation, Inc. X-Content-Scanned: by amun.cheops.ods.org (Exim Exiscan) using SpamAssassin and ClamAV X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: cc45bb68ee235c3a99b47d4b7f5d79ac --Zif13CGLAmVnkPyw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 26-10-2011 18:49:27 +0200, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > > Ok, what's your rationale behind that? >=20 > 1) easier migration to autogenerated ChangeLogs if we want that at > some point, Since the Council has discussed that for several meetings to reach a discussion, I don't think they are shortly going to change their minds. > 2) better availability of the information (right now, looking up > changes sometimes involves checking both CVS log and ChangeLog message > to see what actually happened), Could be considered as a bad commit message. > 3) one step towards preventing useless ChangeLog entries. Also this has been discussed and decided upon by the current and previous Councils, so also that opinion is unlikely to suddenly change. --=20 Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level --Zif13CGLAmVnkPyw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAk6oPf8ACgkQX3X2B8XHTolKLgCfa7uHP6/EeV9lz0XG528eQOfV lFgAoJbjd6fOEvJ0Bq/vt1p4CtyP7L/k =dtWy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Zif13CGLAmVnkPyw--