On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:31:03PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday, September 29, 2011 12:18:17 Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> > On 09/29/2011 12:09 PM, Tony "Chainsaw" Vroon wrote:
> > > On 29/09/11 16:11, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> > >> Otherwise some funny person will use a 4-bit key that expires tomorrow
> > >> just to point out the missing details ...
> > > 
> > > That is a simple case of "don't be a jackass".
> > > I do not feel that it is a productive use of my time to outlegislate
> > > being a jackass in Gentoo.
> > 
> > If I comment on this, I will be bikeshedding ... j/k.
> > 
> > I'd be happy just to see a policy in place saying "we reject unsigned
> > manifests".  I mention the Council because that's one avenue for gentoo
> > wide policy.  The other is a GLEP, but I don't think that's necessary
> > here, or at least not yet.
> 
> the commit hook is waiting on git:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/377233
> 
> then you won't need a policy because you can't commit any other way :p
> -mike

We don't need to wait for git which is forever on the horizon to enforce
it. There are other solutions to use.

-- 
Mr. Aaron W. Swenson
Pseudonym: TitanOfOld
Gentoo Developer