From: William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Should DevRel members be in Council?
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 13:28:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110816182817.GA30214@linux1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E47ADA0.2060906@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 894 bytes --]
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 12:12:32PM +0100, Markos Chandras wrote:
> Quite a few of you know that Council acts as a court in case a developer
> has unresolved disputes with Devrel or when he is not happy with a
> Devrel's decision. The problem is that having the same people in the
> Council and in Devrel makes no sense since the same people will vote
> twice on that matter. A developer who wants to appeal to Council, seeks
> a review of his case and a fresh voting from new people. However, having
> devrel members, which are already biased based on the previous decision,
> makes the "Council's court role" a moot role :)
It definitely does create a conflict of interest.
I think there are a couple of ways to handle it:
1) don't allow council members to be in devrel, or
2) don't allow council members who are also in devrel to vote in
appeals.
What does everyone think?
William
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-16 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-14 11:12 [gentoo-project] Should DevRel members be in Council? Markos Chandras
2011-08-14 11:25 ` Rich Freeman
2011-08-14 14:42 ` Roy Bamford
2011-08-14 14:52 ` Rich Freeman
2011-08-14 16:24 ` Roy Bamford
2011-08-18 0:46 ` Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
2011-08-14 19:01 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-08-14 11:27 ` Fabian Groffen
2011-08-14 11:31 ` Markos Chandras
2011-08-14 11:50 ` Rich Freeman
2011-08-14 11:38 ` Rich Freeman
2011-08-14 12:19 ` Thomas Sachau
2011-08-14 12:26 ` Markos Chandras
2011-08-14 13:14 ` Thomas Sachau
2011-08-14 13:42 ` Markos Chandras
2011-08-14 14:05 ` Petteri Räty
2011-08-14 14:11 ` Markos Chandras
2011-08-14 14:42 ` Petteri Räty
2011-08-14 19:01 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-08-15 2:19 ` Samuli Suominen
2011-08-15 2:46 ` Rich Freeman
2011-08-18 1:25 ` Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
2011-08-16 18:28 ` William Hubbs [this message]
2011-08-16 19:17 ` Rich Freeman
2011-08-16 20:46 ` Donnie Berkholz
2011-08-17 2:46 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-08-16 19:32 ` Roy Bamford
2011-08-18 1:09 ` Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110816182817.GA30214@linux1 \
--to=williamh@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox