From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QqqK3-0008Ur-1t for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 17:42:35 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E0C4821C14E; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 17:42:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from amun.cheops.ods.org (amun.cheops.ods.org [83.161.135.166]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF46E21C3C4 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 17:42:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nut.cheops.ods.org ([2001:980:57a5:1:ca2a:14ff:fe35:7a00] helo=gentoo.org) by amun.cheops.ods.org with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1QqqJg-0005he-78 for gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 19:42:13 +0200 Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 19:42:11 +0200 From: Fabian Groffen To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog generation - pros and cons (council discussion request) Message-ID: <20110809174211.GD24618@gentoo.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org References: <20110602091338.GL14065@gentoo.org> <20110801201623.GX20656@gentoo.org> <20110803174310.GB2924@comet.ucsd.edu> <20110803175650.GN20656@gentoo.org> <20110803180907.GC2924@comet.ucsd.edu> <20110803183304.GP20656@gentoo.org> <20110809173257.GE25611@comet.mayo.edu> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110809173257.GE25611@comet.mayo.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (Darwin 11.0.0, VIM - Vi IMproved 7.3) Organization: Gentoo Foundation, Inc. X-Content-Scanned: by amun.cheops.ods.org (Exim Exiscan) using SpamAssassin and ClamAV X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 3293ec8bad83262647a06cb515409c60 On 09-08-2011 12:32:57 -0500, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > > Yeah, that's already on my draft agenda [1]. =) But we should still have > > > a small set of options to choose from if we do vote to automate, so we > > > don't sit around for another month or discuss it aimlessly for hours. > > > Being prepared is what I'm hoping we can do here. > > > > Ok, then I suggest simply adding ", don't bother about changes between > > CVS log and ChangeLog" to both of your options. > > I guess I don't understand something here. If we aren't retroactively > changing existing ChangeLogs, and we're autogenerating things in the > future, where would these changes come from? so you want to retain all existing ChangeLogs? -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level