From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Qp4Bu-0006wf-PI for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 20:06:51 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9FA6521C1CF; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 20:06:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AA8B21C1CF for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 20:06:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (wl-dy-169-228-178-213.ucsd.edu [169.228.178.213]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: dberkholz) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 687582AC024 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 20:06:32 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 13:06:30 -0700 From: Donnie Berkholz To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Council discuss: overlapping council terms of two years Message-ID: <20110804200630.GE4840@comet.ucsd.edu> References: <20110801184751.GS20656@gentoo.org> <4E3735C8.6000500@gentoo.org> <1312307887.2901.2@NeddySeagoon> <4E38B4D9.7020603@gentoo.org> <1312404150.2882.2@NeddySeagoon> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="AjmyJqqohANyBN/e" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1312404150.2882.2@NeddySeagoon> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: dc13c192527915eda263d1224d7ac9ef --AjmyJqqohANyBN/e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 21:42 Wed 03 Aug , Roy Bamford wrote: > No problem - something as radical as that might have stirred more=20 > interest. And we'd hate to have people actually interested in this. =3D) FWIW, I'd like to see us have 3 people at most on the council. But regardless of how many people there are, I think they should be=20 unequal with different areas of responsibility, independent=20 decision-making authority, and only one person at the top to revert=20 their decisions. I don't really like how all members are at-large. --=20 Thanks, Donnie Donnie Berkholz Council Member / Sr. Developer Gentoo Linux Blog: http://dberkholz.com --AjmyJqqohANyBN/e Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk46+8YACgkQXVaO67S1rtuUmQCcDt9KmApi/vJ6jHmCyuVKAOz6 9x4AoKiPKp10E6aLrn1AgT+J4lcjwHI5 =QHC7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --AjmyJqqohANyBN/e--