From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QosVw-0007dn-8U for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 07:38:44 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5084121C14D; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 07:38:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from amun.cheops.ods.org (amun.cheops.ods.org [83.161.135.166]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E63E421C143 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 07:38:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tefnut.cheops.ods.org ([2001:980:57a5:1:211:24ff:fe37:e46e] helo=gentoo.org) by amun.cheops.ods.org with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Qoh5C-0001Yc-A2 for gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2011 21:26:26 +0200 Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 21:26:10 +0200 From: Fabian Groffen To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Council meeting: Tuesday 9 August, 1900 UTC Message-ID: <20110803192610.GR20656@gentoo.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org References: <20110803182503.GE2924@comet.ucsd.edu> <20110803210001.17556342@pomiocik.lan> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110803210001.17556342@pomiocik.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (Darwin 8.11.0, VIM - Vi IMproved 7.3) Organization: Gentoo Foundation, Inc. X-Content-Scanned: by amun.cheops.ods.org (Exim Exiscan) using SpamAssassin and ClamAV Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: c4511b0810c0a31a2ae6e7b1f9324ac9 On 03-08-2011 21:00:01 +0200, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > > If you have anything you'd like to push to the council for > > discussion, feel free to reply to this thread. >=20 > I'd like the Council to put some point on the topic of changing eclass > APIs heavily with EAPI bumps [3]. I don't think this is council territory. This is just a single incident, and its directly related to a former developer who has a track record of getting into situations like this. Since the Python team already opened up a discussion on it [4], I suggest you to work it out with them, instead of requesting the council to make a harsh rule that will affect them. --=20 Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level