From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QogQL-0007UI-Ne for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2011 18:44:09 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C6D67E04ED; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 18:44:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from amun.cheops.ods.org (amun.cheops.ods.org [83.161.135.166]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D2B6E04E7 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 18:43:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tefnut.cheops.ods.org ([2001:980:57a5:1:211:24ff:fe37:e46e] helo=gentoo.org) by amun.cheops.ods.org with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1QogQ2-00086l-P9 for gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2011 20:43:51 +0200 Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 20:43:38 +0200 From: Fabian Groffen To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog generation - pros and cons (council discussion request) Message-ID: <20110803184338.GQ20656@gentoo.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org References: <20110602091338.GL14065@gentoo.org> <20110801201623.GX20656@gentoo.org> <20110803174310.GB2924@comet.ucsd.edu> <20110803175650.GN20656@gentoo.org> <4E39906F.8070300@gentoo.org> <20110803183040.GO20656@gentoo.org> <4E3995EA.9060800@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E3995EA.9060800@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (Darwin 8.11.0, VIM - Vi IMproved 7.3) Organization: Gentoo Foundation, Inc. X-Content-Scanned: by amun.cheops.ods.org (Exim Exiscan) using SpamAssassin and ClamAV X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 0a9d63221db07de74c23a1e8d7438feb On 03-08-2011 19:39:38 +0100, Markos Chandras wrote: > What I meant was that the previous council already approved > auto-generation as a concept without providing a permanent solution. > Therefore, your implicit question "should ChangeLogs be auto-generated > at all?" confused me. I see. I misunderstood your question, sorry. We seem to agree then :) -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level