From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MHrpU-0003SH-E8 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 04:05:24 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C3BF3E02C7; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 04:05:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EAE6E02C7 for ; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 04:05:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gentoo.org (c-98-246-79-112.hsd1.or.comcast.net [98.246.79.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F41D658D9; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 04:05:19 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:05:18 -0700 From: Donnie Berkholz To: Denis Dupeyron Cc: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo Council 2009/2010 - Nominations are now open Message-ID: <20090620040518.GC22869@comet> References: <1243859390.31661.82.camel@liasis.inforead.com> <4A350508.9090207@gentoo.org> <20090620033515.GA22869@comet> <7c612fc60906192102o30f15f2o5acfed508aaacda6@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="raC6veAxrt5nqIoY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7c612fc60906192102o30f15f2o5acfed508aaacda6@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) X-Archives-Salt: 5bfa2271-033d-4cdf-b529-f20b999e4b5b X-Archives-Hash: f7e322a39aaa21f0eeedf812c74eaf6a --raC6veAxrt5nqIoY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 22:02 Fri 19 Jun , Denis Dupeyron wrote: > > Just to get it out there, I don't think there's any actual conflict here > > (although the foundation bylaws disallow it, presumably because some > > people appear to think there is -- the reasoning isn't explained). They > > have completely separate roles without significant overlap. >=20 > The bylaws do disallow it. See section 5.2. That's what I said: "the foundation bylaws disallow it." Then I=20 continued to say the lack of explanation does not help understand why. --=20 Thanks, Donnie Donnie Berkholz Team lead, public relations Gentoo Linux Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com --raC6veAxrt5nqIoY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAko8X/4ACgkQXVaO67S1rtsS2wCeNaOqtJQb7Z+pyZGJImQHrNfv z/kAoLe9ROJstPOeweJzgu4sdehBzTTL =j7mi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --raC6veAxrt5nqIoY--