From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LPmq1-0007ee-0u for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:50:25 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 12B07E063D; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:50:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEFE9E063D for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:50:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gentoo.org (xray.science.oregonstate.edu [128.193.220.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59AA1648AA; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:50:22 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:50:22 -0800 From: Donnie Berkholz To: Alec Warner Cc: AllenJB , gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Stabilization process addition: Announcements about required manual intervention Message-ID: <20090121235022.GE15870@comet> References: <4957F8E2.5060206@allenjb.me.uk> <49581221.6030002@gentoo.org> <4958178A.4080602@allenjb.me.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VUDLurXRWRKrGuMn" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Archives-Salt: 7f3f49cc-9842-41c4-9736-fb78e2038a44 X-Archives-Hash: 9e81b12f6f30e6aff368aeac8271a50f --VUDLurXRWRKrGuMn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 18:00 Mon 29 Dec , Alec Warner wrote: > > And who is going to make sure that developers are using it to keep users > > informed of (potential) issues? > > >=20 > I think the idea of some kind of 'news police' is stupid. Responsible > developers will write items, have them checked by someone and then > submit them. Irresponsible developers will not. I think keeping this informal is a good idea. Gentoo has a huge problem=20 where people feel the need to write down every little detail and turn it=20 into a policy instead of just using common sense. --=20 Thanks, Donnie Donnie Berkholz Developer, Gentoo Linux Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com --VUDLurXRWRKrGuMn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkl3tL4ACgkQXVaO67S1rtt3yQCfbQVQEwrJMdANVrU+Un90PyCz 0DEAn2nNgOEk5SachxdtXzcwuIX3divC =VYOX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VUDLurXRWRKrGuMn--