From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K4hMn-0001Uh-V5 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 06 Jun 2008 19:12:50 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 390DAE04CC; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 19:12:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 098CBE04CA; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 19:12:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gentoo.org (xray.science.oregonstate.edu [128.193.220.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 989AE67602; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 19:12:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 12:12:44 -0700 From: Donnie Berkholz To: Ferris McCormick Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev] Nominations open for the Gentoo Council 2008/2009 Message-ID: <20080606191244.GA15286@comet> References: <3c32f69c0806041700h42cc5110y34400ec34184e77c@mail.gmail.com> <1212690820.2631.1@spike> <20080606013721.06a5c36f@anaconda.krait.us> <1212759129.17090.138.camel@liasis.inforead.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1212759129.17090.138.camel@liasis.inforead.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Archives-Salt: 46f16877-5ce9-4c79-8b3b-2dd1c6c5cee7 X-Archives-Hash: 8da5c8a19f2a467f0a9760ca7fe3c7bd On 13:32 Fri 06 Jun , Ferris McCormick wrote: > On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 01:37 +0000, Ferris McCormick wrote: > And the bit about hearing appeals assumes that devrel initiated the > disciplinary action being appealed. I'd make it explicit that Council > is not itself a disciplinary body --- resolving conflicts is what devrel > is for among other things. Yes, that is one thing devrel does. Devrel's authority to do this is delegated from the council, so it is also within the council's abilities if the council sees such action as necessary but not happening. Thanks, Donnie -- gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org mailing list