From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JyCXG-0000EP-6h for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 19 May 2008 21:04:46 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 82A0FE050B; Mon, 19 May 2008 21:04:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4480CE050B for ; Mon, 19 May 2008 21:04:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id z27so572182ugc.49 for ; Mon, 19 May 2008 14:04:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type; bh=1dx2+ULETDgW3S8fl+1OMdDg8008iZmtgS+MEw06W24=; b=p8481bE43N2IZjEphyvPrT7H44/pka+eIzSXvg+ZdUb/banEmWlSaLaL2zuXCthAsD8IAm9/MFtENta6s36OSeAuwxloB6wKEcr4k6k+egMUcVOteLcTmCFtiXnOT+GDAYDu6MIOrn1Ul9xKr65J8/JVM71vmbD0PQKNH2193S0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type; b=BwfXAd/EnzDPywG1qvkMK7kXNbkVBZvafUJmaxzTcoO+FmyfrjnF8G3isMNNiddq4C0KiOmMe07lUGIXYie779r6v2fHG3zF0bo+xho5tKFtgvJOD2Ci4Frm+73JxAXHsxrSMfuBtMTso9rIdenSP+oegNc5FNyf20phlzXXgyI= Received: by 10.67.103.10 with SMTP id f10mr4526502ugm.1.1211231083530; Mon, 19 May 2008 14:04:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from snowcone ( [213.121.151.206]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u6sm7505436uge.70.2008.05.19.14.04.42 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 19 May 2008 14:04:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 22:04:36 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Special meeting [WAS: Council meeting summary for 8 May 2008] (fwd) Message-ID: <20080519220436.60ed51dd@snowcone> In-Reply-To: References: <1211216933.5605.32.camel@liasis.inforead.com> <20080519195024.3510ba2b@snowcone> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.4.0 (GTK+ 2.12.9; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/VZ=W=4fpR8yQ3yzJTMvCJxY"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: ab2071e2-4f2c-4e81-ad3a-ca9eb435abc4 X-Archives-Hash: 8cb700ce9bf1bd7258f8076afa1e8bdd --Sig_/VZ=W=4fpR8yQ3yzJTMvCJxY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 19 May 2008 21:53:01 +0100 Steve Long wrote: > Politicking and sniping? Just like the old days; everyone else has > moved on. Why not just concentrate on your Gentoo fork[1]? Or is all > this FUD just a way of slowing down the competition? Well it's been > working for 2 or 3 years, I can see why you keep on with the tactic. >=20 > I assume you won't be using the Gentoo tree, with its shoddy QA, for > exherbo? >=20 > [1] http://www.exherbo.org/ Oh dear. It took under a day from the announcement to the first silly FUD like that to crop up. http://ciaranm.wordpress.com/2008/05/19/paludis-gentoo-and-exherbo/ I do believe I addressed all your nonsense before you even posted it. Now please don't do it again. I'm going to be ignoring anything further along those lines. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/VZ=W=4fpR8yQ3yzJTMvCJxY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkgx62YACgkQ96zL6DUtXhFgSwCfbFt3pZEIegkAmi4e/NSi32DI DqEAn0V8Pwy+9TCitgps/NNWpudtXvmK =sqix -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/VZ=W=4fpR8yQ3yzJTMvCJxY-- -- gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org mailing list