From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jx8f7-0006LV-Jm for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 16 May 2008 22:44:29 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 51575E03F8; Fri, 16 May 2008 22:44:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.171]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 112FCE03F8 for ; Fri, 16 May 2008 22:44:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id z27so10653ugc.49 for ; Fri, 16 May 2008 15:44:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type; bh=sef0sL67qsASAlhH/s4v5kX+yFjIlWygzGSKXAiSrwM=; b=D314LrTgJJe0eD5D1D8e7zHbPlX+E+w5a0z4cz5ZugdCgYCpLfb273Lxdxty8kQdn/BA5U4m5cfsI7nll46M9YntyZ8R3txH7zaexpgOxV0FvKdSNZ9rOkXThgh8K3kZBJn3lkSu+5e4fg42a6SsAPOo8raK9uv+wGSTnn9Kvvo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type; b=cy4ACSOynBY6YWEBLIe3zYL6fdeS99GZUluVOo1AEwm8j7rCtzIn/EkoyarlimEGkMUMbqAmVuysTHIZPYqqbX08x0Wdwihk3pmwH3vxOr1E5yecEI1vdLP/LQXM4G8q1cKl7hz0Qf/I7m3EkvLRnwBB4GipYjcofjwAcT99mx4= Received: by 10.66.220.12 with SMTP id s12mr70303ugg.29.1210977866744; Fri, 16 May 2008 15:44:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ( [213.121.151.206]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k28sm55419ugd.41.2008.05.16.15.44.25 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 16 May 2008 15:44:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 23:44:20 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev] Special meeting [WAS: Council meeting summary for 8 May 2008] Message-ID: <20080516234420.50bfc6e4@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <482E0D07.4070905@thefreemanclan.net> References: <20080508233328.GA8896@comet> <20080515204913.GA22285@comet> <20080515220543.5c5a2c03@snowcone> <482CB0B2.6090702@gentoo.org> <20080516164612.GA14234@comet> <482DF281.6010208@gentoo.org> <20080516213454.538ce4e8@anaconda.krait.us> <482E0D07.4070905@thefreemanclan.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/e8uq_lZoly3CVQuGLPJ634c"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: c2ee08bb-cc56-40b1-adaa-ab6875c17474 X-Archives-Hash: d38bb8eea466d8b4ed19b73530e09f48 --Sig_/e8uq_lZoly3CVQuGLPJ634c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 16 May 2008 18:39:03 -0400 Richard Freeman wrote: > Ferris McCormick wrote: > > And as I've said before, if we think a policy doesn't make sense, we > > can change it. But changing a policy that affects Council and then > > applying it retroactively gets tricky, because Council themselves > > are part of the approval process. =20 >=20 > Nothing too tricky - council votes that the GLEP is to be modified=20 > retroactively. A few folks complain. Life goes on. They don't have that authority. GLEP 39 wasn't approved as a GLEP. It was approved by global vote, and retroactively written up as a GLEP to make it easy to reference and find. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/e8uq_lZoly3CVQuGLPJ634c Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFILg5I96zL6DUtXhERAoYhAKCOz0Rau7YQb02ig2B85NZ3Ttp07ACgphSg QxCAFCAW5ZTRj4pEpiu7rd4= =T6Fu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/e8uq_lZoly3CVQuGLPJ634c-- -- gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org mailing list