From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jwl7I-0004gf-2S for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 15 May 2008 21:36:00 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 03711E06B1; Thu, 15 May 2008 21:35:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0940E06B1 for ; Thu, 15 May 2008 21:35:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id z27so1462773ugc.49 for ; Thu, 15 May 2008 14:35:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type; bh=rH7KUA47jaS6ciKd1ZlQuFcaO+oBb0ttqJn97bW3QpM=; b=yBhdAGV35mzjBO8zGLMo750SJsXTQAR11oUTsLD+H5QauaoPNC8FLJVrgP9aB9tJExs/f6M5HLWdplt2sPiVFA+Lf1vdeapExll+oJTEma4/tSI4OyqFAL/9BVgR8scs0UTIXQ4V+mhJuUOpQnqlbAtR0KoKhFuRF0+eo0iIKfo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type; b=J3v5og9EgCTjKMEiJERxL+CQceS2ZK/TwWx4rNXuT36IW97IU0Qsxb7Ky9JPS0OF6jN5pL5yHZGdVTarhioXxy3mfSyXHZDo/NBofMpRo/kL74KyTia/wv4k52Z/aZq1Q8Vkqf6TFI/y/zI5pjKCgFuHJv7JC9nR4O2cwCgxgT4= Received: by 10.66.216.7 with SMTP id o7mr10701291ugg.69.1210887357460; Thu, 15 May 2008 14:35:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from snowcone ( [213.121.151.206]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u7sm5058397uge.15.2008.05.15.14.35.56 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 15 May 2008 14:35:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 22:35:50 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev] Special meeting [WAS: Council meeting summary for 8 May 2008] Message-ID: <20080515223550.42576be4@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <482CAB54.2010204@gentoo.org> References: <20080508233328.GA8896@comet> <20080515204913.GA22285@comet> <482CAB54.2010204@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.12.9; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/N5M=+4KJTSaANenKqa6u3nt"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 9ac154e6-83c7-4d40-8b8a-c943b2b6cb0e X-Archives-Hash: 521a2b10fe81ff12c29e0b7d543d3d88 --Sig_/N5M=+4KJTSaANenKqa6u3nt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 15 May 2008 17:29:56 -0400 Richard Freeman wrote: > Did this meeting have sufficient notice to be considered an official=20 > meeting? Normally bylaws that govern matters like these also > stipulate that meetings have a certain notice process to ensure that > everybody knows about them. The bylaws that govern this matter are GLEP 39. GLEP 39 lets the Council decide when they hold meetings and how they go about it (so long as they at least have one open meeting per month). The Council decided at the end of their previous meeting to hold a second meeting, so it clearly counts -- it wasn't like it was one person saying "we're having a meeting in five minutes because I say so, and if people don't show up they get slacker marks!"... --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/N5M=+4KJTSaANenKqa6u3nt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkgsrLkACgkQ96zL6DUtXhEg5gCdGb7t2x8K24LIPRX5bG4Taq6h EXcAnAlBdxh8KwpRCsmhwZByCArVb2YQ =fdA9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/N5M=+4KJTSaANenKqa6u3nt-- -- gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org mailing list