From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J4Jcp-0004RP-Qq for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:19:32 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id lBHHJFBj005574; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:19:15 GMT Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.239]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lBHHJElw005569 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:19:15 GMT Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so923236nze.1 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 09:19:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=0B3oPmIdnvA8xrm/V2VkmzsEVQU8CJS7K5j+imqQP7k=; b=eMr88gzZefz+R1vYYKk5WnsXvq6mF72Wt1tti2vgxs8DPtCqHeTzPTWQk56e1Z1gAhq/mwN67kAWp/6LTYz280C5IN1cOGDlsL7ztgcTbmLlWFivp9SMlJ0xwl1ATm0hM/+pN9lungidmdyrLOfWahg95sLXrsTkrzXI1HdKyvg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=vB0g6avzAU1kHdkx4QHFcZqz39JlKmBIxOy0I6VvwAgdDYvyMX2DNKR0s1yiZsdFocLi5daNKJFpzLaJvUXHHc/DhOlKfAgA4/xRT2ckG4TX6MpPTIjkNJwfk7mWQq79/CyU5hRPRNh7FqPwauGccdWD8Uh2QC3y+o5OlE0BZvY= Received: by 10.114.130.1 with SMTP id c1mr3109808wad.52.1197911953938; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 09:19:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from emachine.mpa.com ( [66.19.241.173]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t1sm16749045poh.2007.12.17.09.19.06 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 17 Dec 2007 09:19:12 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Anderson To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Re: PMS Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 12:26:01 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20071216162713.2d4b7266@blueyonder.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1717544.mAGPrElR1B"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200712171226.07100.gentoofan23@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 8edfb3df-e3db-4bb9-a1f0-42bc4d4d4e26 X-Archives-Hash: ed134a65c88061efdb1cb57d9edc75a5 --nextPart1717544.mAGPrElR1B Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 17 December 2007 02:17:32 Steve Long wrote: > It does a bit more than that. And like I said, that's extraneous to Gentoo > needs, and is in fact only really needed for Paludis, not pkgcore and > certainly not portage development. As ciaranm pointed out, thats completely untrue. For one thing, PMS documen= ts=20 how ebuilds are written(somewhat). PMS is used for things besides=20 paludis/pkgcore/portage. For an example, see app-portage/gatt-svn.=20 Gatt(written by mlangc) had to implement an atom parser. The only way this= =20 would be easily done was through PMS. So yes, PMS is useful besides the 3=20 package managers. =2D-=20 2.6.23-gentoo-r3 --nextPart1717544.mAGPrElR1B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBHZrEpF6yMcaBxwHkRAuKnAKCiDvb9r8309o50hGCZ7VQ9cIJp+wCeOWNd i4wn7XIbHSjdtJdexJqrPw0= =f5oT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1717544.mAGPrElR1B-- -- gentoo-project@gentoo.org mailing list