From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-project+bounces-196-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
	id 1J3wL7-0000wh-42
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 16 Dec 2007 16:27:41 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id lBGGRLDg031936;
	Sun, 16 Dec 2007 16:27:21 GMT
Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lBGGRKlC031929
	for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 16 Dec 2007 16:27:20 GMT
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63DAA8D306
	for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 16 Dec 2007 17:30:20 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at ferdyx.org
Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (tungsteno.ferdyx.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id yuishjhm5Pbz for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>;
	Sun, 16 Dec 2007 17:30:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (unknown [213.121.151.206])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5DB28D305
	for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 16 Dec 2007 17:30:17 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 16:27:13 +0000
From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@blueyonder.co.uk>
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project]  Re: PMS
Message-ID: <20071216162713.2d4b7266@blueyonder.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <fk3cim$nr6$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <fjvsun$irh$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<1197736248l.20970l.1l@spike>
	<fk3cim$nr6$1@ger.gmane.org>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.1.0 (GTK+ 2.12.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-project+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list <gentoo-project.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/+DK9mRJIllreDtXhy5SeRTR";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1
X-Archives-Salt: ef77d0f6-7c1e-4350-bd27-de39f1fe3c63
X-Archives-Hash: 4f01e129525d67160df662a4171db84c

--Sig_/+DK9mRJIllreDtXhy5SeRTR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 14:31:38 +0000
Steve Long <slong@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk> wrote:
> I agree that the EAPI is not fixed until it's agreed and implemented
> by portage. The PMS thing seems extraneous to Gentoo needs atm; it's
> more to enable other projects to interoperate with the tree. It
> certainly wasn't needed for pkgcore imo.

Erm. You need to learn the relationship between EAPI and PMS.

PMS describes EAPIs 0 and 1, and will describe any future EAPIs once
they're agreed upon.

--=20
Ciaran McCreesh

--Sig_/+DK9mRJIllreDtXhy5SeRTR
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHZVHh96zL6DUtXhERAs0pAJ914Ea3/5sW6UU/DkT6gX11gj3YOwCg142s
qDxUh29lVIMjL/2rEoQNU8o=
=WoGs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/+DK9mRJIllreDtXhy5SeRTR--
-- 
gentoo-project@gentoo.org mailing list