From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J3aCQ-0002iX-FU for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2007 16:49:14 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id lBFGmesN005744; Sat, 15 Dec 2007 16:48:40 GMT Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lBFGmdw4005714 for ; Sat, 15 Dec 2007 16:48:40 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC4058D3F4 for ; Sat, 15 Dec 2007 17:51:30 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at ferdyx.org Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tungsteno.ferdyx.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4dG-DYhujLIB for ; Sat, 15 Dec 2007 17:51:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (unknown [213.121.151.206]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3353E8D3ED for ; Sat, 15 Dec 2007 17:51:28 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 16:48:30 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] PMS Message-ID: <20071215164830.154e8016@blueyonder.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <1197736248l.20970l.1l@spike> References: <1197736248l.20970l.1l@spike> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.1.0 (GTK+ 2.12.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/Eqx2poW.U0mPpdjkVAa1DHo"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: af409b01-619e-4886-b522-fd9afc821321 X-Archives-Hash: 632de3f1b58def1e22441152e28fab6f --Sig_/Eqx2poW.U0mPpdjkVAa1DHo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 16:30:48 +0000 Roy Bamford wrote: > The offical package manager is portage. If another package manager > does something different to portage - even if it fixes a bug in > portage, by definition, its not compliant. Incorrect. The Council has stated that once PMS has been accepted, any PMS compliant package manager is acceptable, and any package manager deviating from PMS is buggy. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/Eqx2poW.U0mPpdjkVAa1DHo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHZAVe96zL6DUtXhERAoYeAKCpspZLrBNOaO8w9caDGcrrwCHtqwCfR5i9 OGxcKhCUzcq/GZDZwZXjb80= =2SiU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/Eqx2poW.U0mPpdjkVAa1DHo-- -- gentoo-project@gentoo.org mailing list