From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Qnzd0-0002lh-I7 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 21:02:22 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5BFF021C08B; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 21:02:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4A8521C3C9 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 21:02:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.92]) by a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p71L23db008316 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 23:02:03 +0200 Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.4/8.14.2) with ESMTP id p71L222s006404; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 23:02:02 +0200 Received: (from ulm@localhost) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p71L224J006403; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 23:02:02 +0200 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Message-ID: <20023.5194.711313.587404@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 23:02:02 +0200 To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-project] Re: reopening gentoo-council In-Reply-To: <4E370FE5.80102@gentoo.org> References: <20110729175513.GA20656@gentoo.org> <20021.34809.183259.704704@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <4E370FE5.80102@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: VM 8.1.1 under 23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) From: Ulrich Mueller Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: fd4c123fe591bd93638d1097842ad619 >>>>> On Mon, 01 Aug 2011, Petteri R=E4ty wrote: > Your rational is a bit off or can be understood incorrectly in how > the current rules go. Discussion should happen on the on topic > mailing list (most of the time gentoo-dev or gentoo-project). > gentoo-project is only used to submit threads to the agenda > regardless of where the discussion happens. gentoo-dev-announce can > be used to draw attention to important things. How do you propose > people decide if something is gentoo-council material or do we go > back to the situation where threads get fragmented to multiple > mailing lists? If actual discussion happens elsewhere than > gentoo-council then I don't think we need a separate mailing list > just for handling agendas etc. Finally I think gentoo-project / > gentoo-dev reach a wider audencience but we should get verified > numbers from infra. gentoo-dev, -project, -dev-announce ... this would mean that we split discussions between three mailing lists at least. (Probably more, for example PMS/EAPI related stuff should be discussed on gentoo-pms then.) That's too complicated for my simple mind. Ulrich