From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3360C138247 for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 19:03:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C4B19E096B; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 19:03:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33997E093A for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 19:03:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from devil (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ago) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 27B2333EEE0 for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 19:03:41 +0000 (UTC) From: Agostino Sarubbo To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2013-10-08 Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 20:03:34 +0100 Message-ID: <1773721.JluBDhu8ie@devil> User-Agent: KMail/4.10.5 (Linux/3.2.42-hardened-r1; KDE/4.10.5; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20131102185217.GA32534@linux1> References: <201309242248.36395.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <20131102185217.GA32534@linux1> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Archives-Salt: ddea1c23-bdb1-4bfc-b96a-4f53387545f6 X-Archives-Hash: b354a7125e010e684740a09af37c8915 On Saturday 02 November 2013 13:52:17 William Hubbs wrote: > 1) empty keywords (this appears to be what most people are doing) > 2) package.mask (not required, the way I see it, because of 1 and > because package.mask shouldn't be permanent) > 3) both package.mask and empty keywords (this would be double masking, > and again shouldn't be necessary) > > Thoughts? The goal is avoid to install them without any type of interactions. I guess empty keywords respect that and at the same time avoid us to write the package.mask file. -- Agostino Sarubbo Gentoo Linux Developer