Re: [gentoo-project] Meeting agenda - Council meeting 2018-04-08

["Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1195 bytes --]

Am Samstag, 7. April 2018, 20:37:21 CEST schrieb Matthew Thode:

> Second, I highly doubt that any other org would be willing to manage the
> project without at least some sort of license/trademark agreement
> between the foundation and them.

As long as no public representation takes place, I see no need for that. 
However, this is a valid point that needs to be considered.

> Third,  I also doubt any org stepping in would want to manage one of two
> accounts (bank wise), they'd want to manage all the money.

Incorrect. 

(And if you ever bothered to actually read my mails, I already pointed that 
out.)

Quoting the SPI web pages: "SPI does not prohibit the project from having a 
similar relationship with other fiscal sponsors."

> We'd be replacing one structure, where two groups think they
> are in charge but one legally is, with two groups who think they are in
> charge and both legally are.

That sentence brings up a philosophical question. What happens if you think 
you're in charge, but nobody else does? (maybe except veremit)

-- 
Andreas K. Hüttel
dilfridge@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux developer
(council, toolchain, perl, libreoffice, comrel)

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 981 bytes --]