On Tue, 2019-02-19 at 15:16 -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
> Also, as far as I'm aware GLEP 63 does not require an encryption key
> at all, just a signing key.  I'm not sure if such signing-keys will be
> signed by Gentoo under this proposal.  If not then there is nothing to
> upload to the keyserver, and in any case it seems like the main use
> case of this (sending encrypted email) would not apply.  Of course it
> could still be used for verifying email signatures if we sign
> signing-only keys.

If someone really believes it's fine to have no encryption subkey just
because the GLEP doesn't require one explicitly...  It either means that
person is seriously lacking the technical competence, or is a horrible
troll.  In either case, I don't believe such a person should be a Gentoo
developer.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny