From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96567138334 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2018 20:38:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 349B2E0841; Sat, 16 Jun 2018 20:37:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (dev.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8D09E083E for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2018 20:37:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot (d202-252.icpnet.pl [109.173.202.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 15564335C03; Sat, 16 Jun 2018 20:37:54 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1529181471.1994.13.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] William Hubbs council manifesto 2018-2019 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2018 22:37:51 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20180616202634.GA29371@linux1.home> References: <20180616202634.GA29371@linux1.home> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.24.6 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: d5cbb1ff-ec03-4055-85c4-4e9537bcbabd X-Archives-Hash: 4ddb99033c31c8753e07da247ed87289 W dniu sob, 16.06.2018 o godzinie 15∶26 -0500, użytkownik William Hubbs napisał: > I believe the council and trustees should be working as a team to lead > Gentoo. We serve different functions, so there is room for both groups. > We have been adversarial lately and I don't think this is good. As a > council member, I will work to improve this situation. How are you planning to achieve this goal? > I feel that we need better code of conduct enforcement and possibly a > more clear code of conduct. I will work with the council and the > Community Relations team to make this happen. Again, how? > The council should be asked to make a decision on an issue only when > the issue cannot be settled by the community itself. Innovations should > come from the developers, and the council should do what it can to > support these innovations. > > When the council is asked to make a decision, it should be fully > informed about both sides of the issue before it votes. On the other > hand, the council should not block progress by taking an extremely long > time to make a decision. What criteria should the Council consider when making a decision? > If anyone has any questions about anything I have said here, please feel > free to ask in this thread. > During the last term, you have suggested that if an individual serving simultaneously on the Council and QA, then we're dealing with a conflict of interest. Are you going to pursue that thread? -- Best regards, Michał Górny