From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AD0D138334 for ; Sat, 9 Jun 2018 07:52:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D4EC4E08D9; Sat, 9 Jun 2018 07:52:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (dev.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98279E08D4 for ; Sat, 9 Jun 2018 07:52:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot (d202-252.icpnet.pl [109.173.202.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 509C9335CA7; Sat, 9 Jun 2018 07:52:47 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1528530763.1261.36.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Repo mirror & CI: official statement wrt GitHub From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2018 09:52:43 +0200 In-Reply-To: <23323.34479.67401.2943@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> References: <1528529135.1261.34.camel@gentoo.org> <23323.34479.67401.2943@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.24.6 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: f1ecedf1-d8c7-4283-b68a-81384bf6725b X-Archives-Hash: 11c2ebad2038c6887185605d0ca64549 W dniu sob, 09.06.2018 o godzinie 09∶50 +0200, użytkownik Ulrich Mueller napisał: > > > > > > On Sat, 09 Jun 2018, Michał Górny wrote: > > To those who believe moving out of GitHub is the only thing to do, > > I would like to remind you of two things. Firstly, if Microsoft > > indeed has malicious intent, then they've already won because you've > > let them fragment the community. Secondly, how do you know that > > GitLab won't be sold to another 'big player' soon enough? > > GitLab is free software though, so one can always host one's own > instance of it. This is not possible with GitHub which is proprietary. > ...and how is this relevant when people are moving to gitlab.com rather than their own instance? Also, isn't GitLab partially proprietary? -- Best regards, Michał Górny