From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2D881382C5 for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2018 07:24:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 85F5FE0857; Sat, 14 Apr 2018 07:24:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (dev.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50BA4E082B for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2018 07:24:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot (d202-252.icpnet.pl [109.173.202.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 32C17335C8D; Sat, 14 Apr 2018 07:24:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1523690669.1482.5.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] pre-GLEP: Gentoo Developer status From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2018 09:24:29 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <1523640697.5139.2.camel@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.24.6 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 3a3f0ea3-a99d-49cd-bf71-f79037796a02 X-Archives-Hash: 96d47abcf6389cc0e909c4fcbdcfa110 W dniu pią, 13.04.2018 o godzinie 23∶28 +0200, użytkownik Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) napisał: > Hi Michał, > > Taking into account that the letter and not the spirit of GLEP 39 is > usually thrown around as a weapon ("INFORMATIVE", HAH!). I strongly > disrecommend having more "informative" policies. > > Not to say that whether you like it or not, not all non ebuild related > developer work is necessarily tied to a project. Even GLEP 39 mentions > this: "Not everything (or everyone) needs a project." If you have a good example of a developer contributing to Gentoo without having commit access and without being tied to a project, I'm all ears. > As a closing note, I'm really getting tired of all this "Either you > write ebuilds or you are a piece of shit" philosophy that is running on > the ambient nowadays. If such people want a developer centric source > based distro, who gives shit about the non developers I strongly > recommend trying Exherbo instead. > This is highly inappropriate, especially given that you are a public representative of Gentoo. The GLEP *explicitly* defines that there are both ebuild and non-ebuild contributions, so whatever you're making up, it's irrelevant to the topic at hand. -- Best regards, Michał Górny