From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31A541382C5 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 09:53:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CD105E0871; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 09:53:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A0FAE0870 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 09:53:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot (d202-252.icpnet.pl [109.173.202.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 500FD335CFB; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 09:53:02 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1522317178.1006.9.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2018-04-08 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 11:52:58 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87muyt9njh.fsf@gentoo.org> References: <87muyt9njh.fsf@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.24.6 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 2b47e063-87a8-438d-ae23-bc6dd59829f7 X-Archives-Hash: 91df2e7bf8485c2c5abba33ea3063809 W dniu wto, 27.03.2018 o godzinie 17∶11 -0500, użytkownik Matthias Maier napisał: > The next council meeting is in about two weeks. This is the time to > raise and prepare items that the council should put on the agenda to > discuss or vote on. > > Please respond to this message with agenda items. > > Please repeat your agenda item here with a pointer if you previously > suggested one (since the last meeting)! > > The agenda for the meeting will be sent out on Sunday 2018-04-01. > If we manage to find the time after solving the important cat problem, I'd like the Council to vote on final EAPI 7 version. This would be all items originally pre-approved, excluding the following: a. Sandbox path removal functions rm* [1] as requested by ulm. We've established that those aren't strictly needed at the moment and we'd like to come up with a better design (possibly a single function instead of 4 we have now, or 8+ we'd have with the proposal). b. Runtime-switchable USE flags [2] due to not being implemented. c. ||= binding any-of deps [3] due to not being implemented (and not even being clear on how it could be implemented). The EAPI 7 draft is available at [4]. Note that it needs to be updated for the removed items. All other items were implemented and tested in Portage. The only item not merged yet is SYSROOT/BROOT whose implementation is still being nitpicked a bit but there's no risk that it wouldn't be finished soon. While at it, I would also like to establish a timeline for permitting tree-wide use of EAPI 7. [1]:https://bugs.gentoo.org/630422 [2]:https://bugs.gentoo.org/424283 [3]:https://bugs.gentoo.org/489458 [4]:https://dev.gentoo.org/~ulm/pms/7-draft/pms.html -- Best regards, Michał Górny