From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D68251382C5 for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 17:33:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D403E0AAF; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 17:33:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (mail.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72166E0AAB for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 17:33:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot (d202-252.icpnet.pl [109.173.202.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BABD3335C72; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 17:33:01 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1517247177.1187.12.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2018-02-11 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 18:32:57 +0100 In-Reply-To: <23149.51865.998621.918722@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> References: <23149.51865.998621.918722@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.24.6 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 545eeebc-a3e2-4380-9298-316ad6a9d828 X-Archives-Hash: a5127b9dfdd5e6537f8293d204befe12 W dniu nie, 28.01.2018 o godzinie 14∶05 +0100, użytkownik Ulrich Mueller napisał: > In two weeks from now, the council will meet again. This is the time > to raise and prepare items that the council should put on the agenda > to discuss or vote on. > > Please respond to this message with agenda items. Do not hesitate to > repeat your agenda item here with a pointer if you previously > suggested one (since the last meeting). > I can think of two past items that need our attention: 1. Continuation on status of nios2/riscv. ========================================= The bug has gotten no attention so far from the person adding those keywords. If he doesn't show any sign of good faith in the next two weeks, I think we should vote for removing the arch along with the relevant profiles. For the record: nios2 was added in Apr 2015, riscv in Aug 2015. Neither has a backing arch team, mail alias, or a single package with keywords. Furthermore, the original committer didn't make a single commit to the relevant profiles since the inception (which looks like copy- paste of some other profile) and the only commits were parts of mass cleanups done by other developers (stale packages, USE flags, etc.) All that considered, I seriously doubt the work done so far has any value for a future support of those arches. 2. Continuation on mailing list posting restrictions ==================================================== We haven't enforced the gentoo-dev posting restrictions so far. I have been approached by a user yesterday who wrongly thought he couldn't post to the list. I think this situation is at least confusing. I believe we should either withdraw the earlier decision and explicitly announce that posting to gentoo-dev will not be restricted to avoid further confusion, or enforce it (how?). That said, I think the list has improved for now, so maybe we don't need to do that after all. Especially given the upcoming possibility of Proctors revival and/or moderation via mailman. -- Best regards, Michał Górny