From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D23B41396D0 for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 08:14:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D4D611FC007; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 08:14:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (dev.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A54351FC005 for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 08:14:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot (d202-252.icpnet.pl [109.173.202.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C1D3733BE25; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 08:14:00 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1505463237.2185.15.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] [PATCH 13/18] glep-0001: Do not require a specific header order From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 10:13:57 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20170914190326.12168-14-mgorny@gentoo.org> References: <20170914190326.12168-1-mgorny@gentoo.org> <20170914190326.12168-14-mgorny@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.24.5 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: dde76a44-1dfb-4f19-a23c-1b128bf2ae28 X-Archives-Hash: 137773862a3db2324f67396266516987 W dniu czw, 14.09.2017 o godzinie 21∶03 +0200, użytkownik Michał Górny napisał: > Most of the GLEPs never really followed the header order specified > in GLEP 1, and there is no technical reason to enforce that. > ulm has requested that we keep the requirement for header order, so I withdraw this patch. Will submit a complete updated batch once I get more feedback. -- Best regards, Michał Górny