From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2158E1396D0 for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 06:31:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1EEB6E0BE6; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 06:31:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (dev.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E045DE0BE5 for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 06:31:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot (d202-252.icpnet.pl [109.173.202.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0A7EE33BE61; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 06:31:07 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1505457064.2185.2.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] [RFC] GLEP 1/2 updates for the new old-school GLEP workflow From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 08:31:04 +0200 In-Reply-To: <2f79e6c1-f3b2-fbdd-1caa-852882ee3715@gentoo.org> References: <20170914190326.12168-1-mgorny@gentoo.org> <2f79e6c1-f3b2-fbdd-1caa-852882ee3715@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.24.5 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: a4e8c9fd-6ef4-4668-800b-5731624627e2 X-Archives-Hash: b123d0483d3f60eb376abe0d54c71896 W dniu czw, 14.09.2017 o godzinie 14∶58 -0700, użytkownik Daniel Campbell napisał: > If I had to find a nitpick, it's a minor feature request: can we get a > GLEP template file later on, to aid the initial drafting process? I > didn't see it in the repo. I see your point. I always took some random late GLEP and wiped out the contents. Maybe having a skel file with just the headings and empty headers wouldn't be such a bad idea after all. I'm wondering if it belongs in the GLEP repo though. Maybe just skel.rst? (given that www globs on glep-[0-9]...) -- Best regards, Michał Górny